Course record INTA
INTA 8001
Seminar in Science, Technology and International Affairs II
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
17 sections6 professors
Grades: 2011–2025Evaluations: 2012–2023
Flunk Score73/100
StrongMargaret Kosal 6 sections · 6 terms · 2016–2021 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2016–2021
Compare with the course
Kosal vs. the course average
A
+7.2
B
−5.2
C
−0.5
D
same
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2016Spring 2021
Overall4.63 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.56
Instructor clarity4.63
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.55
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.68
Instructor respectfulness4.63
Assignment measured knowledge4.44
Instructor stimulates interest4.48
Seymour Goodman 5 sections · 5 terms · 2011–2015 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2011–2015
Compare with the course
Goodman vs. the course average
A
−0.2
B
+2.2
C
−0.5
D
same
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2015
Overall4.07 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.33
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness3.38
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication3.38
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.33
Assignment measured knowledge3.87
Instructor stimulates interest4.38
David Muchlinski 3 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2025 3.40GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Muchlinski vs. the course average
A
−22.6
B
+12.6
C
+2.4
D
same
F
+7.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall2.38 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.77
Instructor clarity1.31
Course effectiveness2.27
Instructor enthusiasm2.31
Instructor helpfulness2.69
Instructor availability3.77
Instructor communication2.27
Instructor effectiveness2.69
Instructor respectfulness1.31
Assignment measured knowledge2.27
Instructor stimulates interest2.69
Kirk Bowman 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Brian Woodall 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.79 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Brandon Merrell 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.90 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.