Course record INTA
INTA 2001
Careers in International Affairs
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2014–2024
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataThis course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Kirk Bowman 12 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness3.00
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Stephanie Jackson 17 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Alasdair Young 24 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Jennifer Jordan 21 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Mikulas Fabry 21 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.67
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.47
Adam Stulberg 21 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.45
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Michael Salomone 24 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Joseph Bankoff 24 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.66
Instructor clarity4.54
Course effectiveness3.94
Instructor enthusiasm4.46
Instructor helpfulness4.12
Instructor availability4.44
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.46
Instructor respectfulness4.64
Assignment measured knowledge3.74
Instructor stimulates interest4.38
Christopher Mcdermott 18 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.89
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.11
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.56
Instructor communication4.29
Instructor effectiveness4.42
Instructor respectfulness4.56
Assignment measured knowledge3.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.42
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.