Course record ID
ID 3510
Introduction to Interactive Product Design
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
29 sections8 professors
Grades: 2011–2025Evaluations: 2013–2023
Flunk Score57/100
Mixed record
James Budd 7 sections · 7 terms · 2011–2023 3.85GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2011–2023
Compare with the course
Budd vs. the course average
A
+4.0
B
−1.7
C
−1.9
D
same
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Spring 2023
Overall4.23 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity3.67
Course effectiveness4.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.53
Instructor helpfulness4.37
Instructor availability3.50
Instructor communication4.27
Instructor effectiveness4.43
Instructor respectfulness4.57
Assignment measured knowledge4.13
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
David Howard 4 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2025 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Howard vs. the course average
A
+6.3
B
−7.2
C
+1.3
D
same
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.72 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.13
Instructor clarity4.63
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.78
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge3.88
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Hyunjoo Oh 5 sections · 5 terms · 2019–2021 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2019–2021
Compare with the course
Oh vs. the course average
A
−0.2
B
+0.3
C
+0.3
D
same
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Fall 2021
Overall4.56 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity4.53
Course effectiveness4.73
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.63
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.73
Instructor respectfulness4.73
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.63
James Hallam 8 sections · 8 terms · 2014–2019 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2014–2019
Compare with the course
Hallam vs. the course average
A
−9.9
B
+12.2
C
−1.9
D
same
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2014Spring 2019
Overall4.56 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.64
Instructor clarity4.46
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.42
Instructor availability4.56
Instructor communication4.44
Instructor effectiveness4.58
Instructor respectfulness4.68
Assignment measured knowledge4.38
Instructor stimulates interest4.74
Yaling Liu 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 3.73GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall3.56 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness2.30
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.00
Instructor effectiveness3.30
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Wei Wang 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.33GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.53 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Noah Posner 5 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.21
Instructor helpfulness3.99
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.22
Instructor effectiveness4.48
Instructor respectfulness4.03
Instructor stimulates interest4.03
Sang-Won Leigh 4 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.20
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.20
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.