Course record FREN
FREN 2002
Intermediate French II
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
61 sections16 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed record
Tatiana Kozhanova 8 sections · 5 terms · 2016–2020 3.89GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2016–2020
Compare with the course
Kozhanova vs. the course average
A
+17.2
B
−14.0
C
−1.2
D
−0.7
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Fall 2020
Overall4.78 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.28
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.64
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.86
Instructor communication4.84
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Christophe Ippolito 3 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2019 3.85GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2012–2019
Compare with the course
Ippolito vs. the course average
A
+11.4
B
−6.4
C
−3.0
D
−0.7
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.78 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity4.67
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.47
Instructor stimulates interest4.57
Sophie Landrieux Kartochian 4 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2023 3.82GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2022–2023
Compare with the course
Kartochian vs. the course average
A
+13.9
B
−10.7
C
−3.0
D
−0.7
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.86 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.29
Instructor clarity4.91
Course effectiveness4.73
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.89
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.96
Instructor respectfulness4.91
Assignment measured knowledge4.56
Instructor stimulates interest4.61
Brigitte Stepanov 3 sections · 3 terms · 2021–2025 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Stepanov vs. the course average
A
+11.9
B
−10.6
C
−3.0
D
−0.7
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.92 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.77
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.88
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.91
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.97
Instructor effectiveness4.97
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.88
Instructor stimulates interest4.84
Viola Green 2 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2019 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017–2019
Compare with the course
Green vs. the course average
A
+0.6
B
+1.7
C
−0.4
D
−0.7
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.70 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Samba Sy 9 sections · 7 terms · 2017–2025 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Sy vs. the course average
A
−5.0
B
+5.8
C
−0.1
D
−0.2
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Spring 2025
Overall4.43 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.16
Instructor clarity4.24
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.42
Instructor helpfulness4.29
Instructor availability4.56
Instructor communication4.44
Instructor effectiveness4.45
Instructor respectfulness4.64
Assignment measured knowledge4.28
Instructor stimulates interest4.39
Nora Cottille-Foley 10 sections · 9 terms · 2010–2022 3.56GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2010–2022
Compare with the course
Cottille-Foley vs. the course average
A
+0.9
B
−5.1
C
+0.7
D
+2.1
F
+1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Spring 2022
Overall4.85 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.84
Course effectiveness4.74
Instructor enthusiasm4.98
Instructor helpfulness4.76
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Assignment measured knowledge4.44
Instructor stimulates interest4.86
Stephanie Boulard 12 sections · 8 terms · 2011–2015 3.50GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2011–2015
Compare with the course
Boulard vs. the course average
A
−12.8
B
+10.9
C
+1.8
D
−0.7
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Fall 2015
Overall4.78 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.64
Instructor clarity4.76
Course effectiveness4.88
Instructor enthusiasm4.96
Instructor helpfulness4.58
Instructor availability4.73
Instructor communication4.69
Instructor effectiveness4.84
Instructor respectfulness4.89
Assignment measured knowledge4.54
Instructor stimulates interest4.78
Marilene Haroux 3 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2011 3.46GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010–2011
Compare with the course
Haroux vs. the course average
A
−23.6
B
+24.7
C
+0.9
D
−0.7
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
Roya Mesbah 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall3.89 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.10
Instructor clarity3.50
Course effectiveness3.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.70
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.