Sarah Fredericks
17 reported responses
4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.26
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.43
Instructor effectiveness4.37
Instructor respectfulness4.58
Assignment measured knowledge3.69
Instructor stimulates interest3.76
Michael Measel
11 reported responses
4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.68
Instructor effectiveness4.68
Instructor respectfulness4.68
Assignment measured knowledge3.89
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Michael Lehman
23 reported responses
4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm3.65
Instructor helpfulness3.85
Instructor availability4.42
Instructor communication4.24
Instructor effectiveness4.24
Instructor respectfulness4.16
Assignment measured knowledge3.62
Instructor stimulates interest3.60
Katherine Musick
10 reported responses
4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.34
Instructor helpfulness4.71
Instructor availability4.54
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.68
Instructor respectfulness4.79
Assignment measured knowledge4.09
Instructor stimulates interest3.96
Renee Buesking
17 reported responses
4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.49
Instructor helpfulness4.39
Instructor availability4.64
Instructor communication4.69
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.87
Instructor stimulates interest3.97
Joseph Salyer
13 reported responses
4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.96
Instructor helpfulness4.87
Instructor availability4.96
Instructor communication4.93
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness4.98
Assignment measured knowledge4.69
Instructor stimulates interest4.86
Misty Fuller
13 reported responses
4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.86
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.86
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness4.73
Assignment measured knowledge4.55
Instructor stimulates interest4.68
Zita Huesing
21 reported responses
4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.88
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.93
Instructor effectiveness4.96
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge4.36
Instructor stimulates interest4.66
Lee Hibbard
14 reported responses
4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.84
Instructor helpfulness4.82
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.84
Instructor respectfulness4.91
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Andrew Nance
10 reported responses
4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.76
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.78
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.29
Matthew Breece
17 reported responses
4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.82
Instructor helpfulness4.91
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.91
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Assignment measured knowledge4.28
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Franziska Tsufim
20 reported responses
4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.84
Instructor helpfulness4.53
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.79
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge3.93
Instructor stimulates interest4.26
Shane Snyder
11 reported responses
4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.78
Instructor helpfulness4.77
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.74
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.31
Instructor stimulates interest4.59
Laine Pomerleau
14 reported responses
4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.78
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.74
Assignment measured knowledge4.09
Instructor stimulates interest4.39
Randall Harrell
11 reported responses
4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.76
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.81
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.74
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.23
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
Cameron Winter
20 reported responses
4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.84
Instructor availability4.79
Instructor communication4.86
Instructor effectiveness4.89
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.15
Instructor stimulates interest4.44
Spencer Chalifour
14 reported responses
4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.62
Instructor communication4.62
Instructor effectiveness4.71
Instructor respectfulness4.91
Assignment measured knowledge4.08
Instructor stimulates interest4.28
Dipanjan Maitra
8 reported responses
4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.28
Instructor availability4.62
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.89
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
John Taylor
19 reported responses
4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.77
Instructor availability4.78
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.79
Instructor respectfulness4.96
Assignment measured knowledge4.17
Instructor stimulates interest4.41
Shannon Dobranski
9 reported responses
4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.59
Instructor helpfulness4.58
Instructor availability4.32
Instructor communication4.38
Instructor effectiveness4.54
Instructor respectfulness4.64
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.29
George Thomas
13 reported responses
4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.74
Instructor communication4.57
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.82
Assignment measured knowledge4.17
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Caitlin Kelly
12 reported responses
4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.54
Instructor helpfulness4.41
Instructor availability4.79
Instructor communication4.38
Instructor effectiveness4.32
Instructor respectfulness4.68
Assignment measured knowledge3.82
Instructor stimulates interest3.72
Shinjini Chattopadhyay
13 reported responses
4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.55
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Wendy Truran
14 reported responses
4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.79
Instructor availability4.86
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.89
Assignment measured knowledge4.27
Instructor stimulates interest4.52
Corey Goergen
11 reported responses
4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.89
Instructor helpfulness4.58
Instructor availability4.78
Instructor communication4.78
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.39
Instructor stimulates interest4.66
Bianca Batti
12 reported responses
4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.99
Instructor helpfulness4.79
Instructor availability4.94
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.96
Instructor respectfulness4.99
Assignment measured knowledge4.52
Instructor stimulates interest4.79
Anu Thapa
14 reported responses
3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness3.13
Instructor availability4.17
Instructor communication3.30
Instructor effectiveness3.68
Instructor respectfulness3.84
Assignment measured knowledge3.11
Instructor stimulates interest3.71
Aleksander Sedzielarz
11 reported responses
4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.94
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.84
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.55
Instructor stimulates interest4.71
Dorothea Coblentz
17 reported responses
4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.69
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.84
Instructor effectiveness4.84
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Assignment measured knowledge4.33
Instructor stimulates interest4.52
Molly Slavin
14 reported responses
4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.94
Instructor helpfulness4.87
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.34
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Rachel Dean-Ruzicka
16 reported responses
4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.37
Instructor availability4.47
Instructor communication4.66
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Assignment measured knowledge4.14
Instructor stimulates interest4.17
Leah Misemer
18 reported responses
4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.79
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.27
Instructor stimulates interest4.38
Kent Linthicum
16 reported responses
4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.84
Instructor availability4.79
Instructor communication4.81
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.89
Assignment measured knowledge4.27
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
Rachel Seiler-Smith
10 reported responses
4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.78
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge4.58
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Hannah Markley
11 reported responses
4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.79
Instructor helpfulness4.52
Instructor availability4.71
Instructor communication4.76
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.86
Assignment measured knowledge4.33
Instructor stimulates interest4.49
Jonathan Shelley
13 reported responses
4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Jill Fennell
9 reported responses
4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
Kathleen Schaag
13 reported responses
4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Mckenna Rose
10 reported responses
4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.89
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.91
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.99
Assignment measured knowledge4.48
Instructor stimulates interest4.72
Amanda Coulter
18 reported responses
4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Courtney Hoffman
16 reported responses
4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.86
Instructor helpfulness4.79
Instructor availability4.84
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.81
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.22
Instructor stimulates interest4.37
Nicholas Sturm
16 reported responses
4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.76
Instructor availability4.86
Instructor communication4.66
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.32
Instructor stimulates interest4.61
Darcy Mullen
13 reported responses
2.89Eval / 5
Overall2.89 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.35
Instructor helpfulness2.42
Instructor availability3.08
Instructor communication2.32
Instructor effectiveness2.51
Instructor respectfulness3.53
Assignment measured knowledge2.62
Instructor stimulates interest2.35
Brandy Blake
13 reported responses
4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.15
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.22
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.78
Assignment measured knowledge4.05
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Bradley Rittenhouse
12 reported responses
4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.35
Instructor helpfulness4.47
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.33
Instructor effectiveness4.67
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.22
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Casey Wilson
14 reported responses
4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.94
Instructor helpfulness4.64
Instructor availability4.86
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge4.61
Instructor stimulates interest4.81
Rebekah Fitzsimmons
15 reported responses
4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.68
Instructor availability4.74
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.69
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge4.08
Instructor stimulates interest4.29
Philip Auslander
14 reported responses
3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.68
Instructor helpfulness4.16
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication3.84
Instructor effectiveness3.86
Instructor respectfulness3.92
Assignment measured knowledge3.38
Instructor stimulates interest3.16
Lauren Neefe
18 reported responses
4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.89
Instructor helpfulness4.52
Instructor availability4.82
Instructor communication4.36
Instructor effectiveness4.54
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Assignment measured knowledge3.97
Instructor stimulates interest4.09
Kathryn Harrison
9 reported responses
4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.52
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.42
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge4.03
Instructor stimulates interest4.13
Kate Holterhoff
16 reported responses
4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.55
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.24
Instructor stimulates interest4.37
Amanda Madden
14 reported responses
4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.66
Instructor helpfulness3.58
Instructor availability4.38
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.38
Assignment measured knowledge3.74
Instructor stimulates interest4.06
Andrew Eichel
14 reported responses
4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.92
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.78
Instructor stimulates interest4.97
Sarah O'Brien
22 reported responses
4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.84
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.48
Instructor effectiveness4.76
Instructor respectfulness4.86
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.52
Sarah Higinbotham
15 reported responses
4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.95
Instructor availability4.91
Instructor communication4.95
Instructor effectiveness4.98
Instructor respectfulness4.99
Assignment measured knowledge4.69
Instructor stimulates interest4.93
Michael Griffin
13 reported responses
4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.41
Instructor availability4.64
Instructor communication4.26
Instructor effectiveness4.57
Instructor respectfulness4.76
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Ruth Yow
12 reported responses
4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.77
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.77
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.53
Instructor stimulates interest4.77
Tobias Wilson-Bates
23 reported responses
4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.58
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.78
Nicole Lobdell
10 reported responses
4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.69
Instructor helpfulness4.41
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication4.47
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Assignment measured knowledge3.91
Instructor stimulates interest4.11
Charles Stivers
20 reported responses
4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.96
Instructor availability4.94
Instructor communication4.84
Instructor effectiveness4.98
Instructor respectfulness4.94
Assignment measured knowledge4.62
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Phoebe Bronstein
14 reported responses
4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.66
Instructor availability4.72
Instructor communication4.61
Instructor effectiveness4.72
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.64
Carol Senf
8 reported responses
4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Kristin Allukian
12 reported responses
4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.58
Instructor availability4.81
Instructor communication4.77
Instructor effectiveness4.81
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.64
Lyndsay Brown
16 reported responses
4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.37
Instructor effectiveness4.43
Instructor respectfulness4.47
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.07
Robert Wood
11 reported responses
3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.15
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness3.92
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.45
Instructor stimulates interest3.20
Jonathan Kotchian
19 reported responses
4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.79
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.71
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Rebecca Weaver
14 reported responses
4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.68
Instructor communication4.52
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.82
Assignment measured knowledge3.96
Instructor stimulates interest4.14
Thomas Crawford
14 reported responses
4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.85
Jennifer Orth-Veillon
9 reported responses
4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.81
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.89
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
Jennifer Lux
24 reported responses
4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.89
Instructor helpfulness4.55
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.68
Instructor effectiveness4.66
Instructor respectfulness4.78
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.33
Peter Fontaine
13 reported responses
4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.33
Instructor availability4.73
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.47
Malavika Shetty
22 reported responses
4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.73
Instructor helpfulness4.53
Instructor availability4.67
Instructor communication4.43
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge3.97
Instructor stimulates interest4.03
Tyanna Herrington
17 reported responses
4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.45
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Anne Pollock
24 reported responses
4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Carol Colatrella
22 reported responses
4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Moinak Choudhury
11 reported responses
4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.68
Instructor helpfulness4.52
Instructor availability4.69
Instructor communication4.68
Instructor effectiveness4.58
Instructor respectfulness4.81
Assignment measured knowledge3.94
Instructor stimulates interest4.17
Leila Gholami
9 reported responses
4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.94
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.78
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.82
Instructor respectfulness4.86
Assignment measured knowledge4.24
Instructor stimulates interest4.38
Ankita Rathour
19 reported responses
4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.99
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.91
Instructor effectiveness4.91
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.64
Instructor stimulates interest4.79
Lisa Jacobson
15 reported responses
4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.94
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.39
Instructor stimulates interest4.63
Show fewer ↑
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.