Course record ECE
ECE 2025
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
11 sections11 professors
Grades: 2010–2012Evaluations: 2012
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score2/100
Needs workMatthieu Bloch 3 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2012 2.99GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010–2012
Compare with the course
Bloch vs. the course average
A
−3.2
B
+6.8
C
+0.2
D
−1.7
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.97 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
James Mcclellan 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011 2.97GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011
Compare with the course
Mcclellan vs. the course average
A
+1.9
B
−1.6
C
+1.8
D
−2.6
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Chrisopher Rozell 2 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2011 2.91GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2010–2011
Compare with the course
Rozell vs. the course average
A
+0.6
B
+0.3
C
−1.3
D
−1.1
F
+1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Biing Juang 2 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2012 2.73GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2010–2012
Compare with the course
Juang vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
−3.2
C
−1.3
D
+7.0
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.55 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.23
Instructor clarity3.50
Course effectiveness3.94
Instructor enthusiasm3.68
Instructor helpfulness3.54
Instructor availability3.56
Instructor communication3.61
Instructor effectiveness3.61
Instructor respectfulness3.78
Assignment measured knowledge3.83
Instructor stimulates interest3.15
Aaron Lanterman 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 3.12GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample
Mark Clements 1 sections · 1 term · 2010 · Limited sample 2.84GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2010 · Limited sample
Gordon Stuber 18 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability3.90
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.45
Instructor respectfulness4.45
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Francesco Fedele 13 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.80
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Xiaoli Ma 18 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.55
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Chin-Hui Lee 13 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Instructor stimulates interest3.65
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.