Course record EAS
EAS 8802
Special Topics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
22 sections9 professors
Grades: 2011–2025Evaluations: 2013–2024
Flunk Score81/100
Excellent
Emanuele Di Lorenzo 5 sections · 5 terms · 2018–2022 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2018–2022
Compare with the course
Lorenzo vs. the course average
A
+6.4
B
−5.7
C
−0.7
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2018Spring 2022
Overall4.62 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.47
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability3.95
Instructor communication4.72
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Peter Webster 2 sections · 2 terms · 2013–2015 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013–2015
Compare with the course
Webster vs. the course average
A
+6.4
B
−5.7
C
−0.7
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.60 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness3.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Jennifer Glass 6 sections · 5 terms · 2020–2025 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2020–2025
Compare with the course
Glass vs. the course average
A
+3.9
B
−5.7
C
+1.8
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2020Spring 2025
Overall4.87 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.56
Instructor clarity4.45
Course effectiveness4.84
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.86
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.89
Instructor effectiveness4.89
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.41
Instructor stimulates interest4.89
Irina Sokolik 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2016 3.72GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2016
Compare with the course
Sokolik vs. the course average
A
−22.1
B
+22.9
C
−0.7
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Fall 2016
Overall4.90 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Raphael Rosenzweig 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Overall4.75 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity4.97
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication3.94
Instructor effectiveness4.44
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Jennifer Mcguire 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.56 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Jean Lynch-Stieglitz 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
James Wray 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.75 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Alexander Robel 7 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.63
Course effectiveness4.33
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.38
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.