Course record EAS
EAS 4740
Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratory
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
15 sections5 professors
Grades: 2011–2024Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score14/100
Needs work
Dana Hartley 3 sections · 3 terms · 2013–2016 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2013–2016
Compare with the course
Hartley vs. the course average
A
+16.4
B
−3.8
C
−11.0
D
−1.6
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.58 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.23
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness4.37
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.43
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.47
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
Yuhang Wang 4 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2022 3.56GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018–2022
Compare with the course
Wang vs. the course average
A
+7.1
B
+3.2
C
−8.7
D
−1.6
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.01 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity3.55
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness3.10
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication2.70
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge3.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Jennifer Kaiser 2 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2024 3.35GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Kaiser vs. the course average
A
+6.4
B
−16.8
C
+12.0
D
−1.6
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.36 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.02
Course effectiveness4.57
Instructor enthusiasm4.26
Instructor helpfulness4.02
Instructor availability4.63
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.43
Instructor respectfulness4.57
Assignment measured knowledge4.11
Instructor stimulates interest4.23
Paul Wine 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2012 3.26GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Wine vs. the course average
A
−15.9
B
+19.3
C
−1.8
D
−1.6
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.46 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Nga Ng 4 sections · 4 terms · 2015–2021 3.01GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2015–2021
Compare with the course
Ng vs. the course average
A
−15.4
B
−0.9
C
+11.9
D
+4.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2015Spring 2021
Overall4.20 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.03
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness3.83
Instructor availability4.25
Instructor communication4.05
Instructor effectiveness4.15
Instructor respectfulness4.25
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.