Course record CX
CX 4140
Computational Modeling Algorithms
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
16 sections6 professors
Grades: 2013–2025Evaluations: 2013–2024
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work
Nabil Imam 5 sections · 4 terms · 2022–2025 3.86GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Imam vs. the course average
A
+22.0
B
−12.5
C
−5.4
D
−1.9
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2022Fall 2025
Overall4.60 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.01
Instructor clarity4.46
Course effectiveness4.68
Instructor enthusiasm4.45
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.76
Instructor communication4.78
Instructor effectiveness4.61
Instructor respectfulness4.73
Assignment measured knowledge4.42
Instructor stimulates interest4.64
Xiuwei Zhang 5 sections · 5 terms · 2019–2025 3.38GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A
−13.8
B
+13.9
C
+0.1
D
+2.0
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Spring 2025
Overall3.64 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.61
Course effectiveness3.88
Instructor enthusiasm3.78
Instructor helpfulness3.42
Instructor availability3.81
Instructor communication3.52
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness3.84
Assignment measured knowledge3.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.36
Bistra Dilkina 2 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2016 3.27GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015–2016
Compare with the course
Dilkina vs. the course average
A
−8.8
B
+2.1
C
+3.8
D
−1.9
F
+4.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.61 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.35
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
David Bader 2 sections · 2 terms · 2013–2014 2.99GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013–2014
Compare with the course
Bader vs. the course average
A
−17.6
B
+5.8
C
+1.1
D
+0.6
F
+10.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.01 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.55
Instructor clarity4.05
Course effectiveness3.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.15
Instructor availability3.75
Instructor communication3.60
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness4.25
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Anne Benoit 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.58GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall3.71 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.30
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm3.80
Instructor helpfulness2.50
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Umit Catalyurek 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.08GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall2.89 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness3.30
Instructor enthusiasm3.00
Instructor availability1.00
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.30
Instructor respectfulness3.00
Assignment measured knowledge2.30
Instructor stimulates interest2.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.