Course record CSE
CSE 6644
Iterative Methods for Systems of Equations
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
36 sections8 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score56/100
Mixed record
Molei Tao 8 sections · 5 terms · 2017–2025 3.96GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Tao vs. the course average
A
+16.9
B
−14.5
C
−1.8
D
same
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Spring 2025
Overall4.67 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.52
Instructor clarity4.66
Course effectiveness4.62
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.42
Instructor availability4.68
Instructor communication4.62
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.76
Assignment measured knowledge4.42
Instructor stimulates interest4.42
Hao-Min Zhou 7 sections · 6 terms · 2013–2024 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2013–2024
Compare with the course
Zhou vs. the course average
A
+16.4
B
−13.9
C
−1.8
D
same
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2013Spring 2024
Overall4.96 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.76
Instructor clarity4.98
Course effectiveness4.98
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.78
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.98
Instructor effectiveness4.98
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.98
Florian Schaefer 3 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2024 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Schaefer vs. the course average
A
+9.6
B
−11.9
C
+2.9
D
same
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.71 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.47
Course effectiveness4.34
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.35
Instructor availability4.97
Instructor communication4.58
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge3.89
Instructor stimulates interest4.78
Edmond Chow 7 sections · 7 terms · 2013–2025 3.73GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2013–2025
Compare with the course
Chow vs. the course average
A
+0.9
B
−2.7
C
+1.1
D
same
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Fall 2025
Overall4.80 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.87
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.78
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.82
Instructor respectfulness4.82
Assignment measured knowledge4.42
Instructor stimulates interest4.78
Hongyuan Zha 4 sections · 4 terms · 2010–2016 3.56GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2010–2016
Compare with the course
Zha vs. the course average
A
−10.5
B
+6.4
C
+1.7
D
same
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2016
Overall4.54 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.45
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Silas Alben 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2012 3.46GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Alben vs. the course average
A
−23.5
B
+16.4
C
+7.6
D
same
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.30 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm2.80
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Luca Dieci 4 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2016 3.42GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2014–2016
Compare with the course
Dieci vs. the course average
A
−36.9
B
+39.3
C
−1.8
D
same
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.54 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.65
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Tobin Isaac 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.63GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Overall4.65 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.