Course record CS
CS 4235
Introduction to Information Security
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
40 sections16 professors
Grades: 2010–2024Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score26/100
Below average
Paul Pearce 5 sections · 4 terms · 2020–2023 3.87GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2020–2023
Compare with the course
Pearce vs. the course average
A
+22.5
B
−15.4
C
−5.2
D
−0.5
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2020Spring 2023
Overall4.68 / 5
76 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.42
Instructor clarity4.69
Course effectiveness4.57
Instructor enthusiasm4.79
Instructor helpfulness4.46
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.79
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge4.27
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Terry Nelms 3 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2021 3.81GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2020–2021
Compare with the course
Nelms vs. the course average
A
+19.2
B
−13.7
C
−4.3
D
+0.4
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.19 / 5
89 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.05
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.05
Instructor helpfulness3.85
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.45
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
Wenke Lee 10 sections · 9 terms · 2012–2023 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2012–2023
Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A
+6.5
B
−2.4
C
−5.3
D
−0.7
F
+1.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2012Fall 2023
Overall3.90 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.72
Instructor clarity3.73
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm3.95
Instructor helpfulness3.67
Instructor availability4.12
Instructor communication4.18
Instructor effectiveness3.87
Instructor respectfulness4.13
Assignment measured knowledge3.67
Instructor stimulates interest3.53
Daniel Genkin 2 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2024 3.56GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Genkin vs. the course average
A
−1.2
B
+3.0
C
−0.7
D
−0.7
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.58 / 5
81 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.43
Instructor clarity4.43
Course effectiveness4.38
Instructor enthusiasm4.84
Instructor helpfulness4.41
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.66
Instructor respectfulness4.56
Assignment measured knowledge3.92
Instructor stimulates interest4.62
James Cannady 5 sections · 5 terms · 2018–2019 3.53GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Cannady vs. the course average
A
−2.6
B
+3.5
C
−1.3
D
+0.9
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2018Fall 2019
Overall4.76 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.15
Instructor stimulates interest4.72
Charles Phillips 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2012 3.52GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Phillips vs. the course average
A
−13.6
B
+21.5
C
−5.7
D
−0.7
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.15 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.95
Instructor clarity4.05
Course effectiveness3.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness3.75
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge3.75
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Joel Odom 3 sections · 3 terms · 2014–2016 3.15GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2014–2016
Compare with the course
Odom vs. the course average
A
−27.6
B
+16.4
C
+11.0
D
same
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.78 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Pak Chung 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall3.56 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity3.70
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm3.30
Instructor helpfulness3.80
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.30
Instructor effectiveness3.50
Instructor respectfulness3.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Ellen Zegura 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.39 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Bradley Reaves 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.92 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.