Course record CS
CS 3630
Introduction to Perception and Robotics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
27 sections9 professors
Grades: 2011–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record
Harish Ravichandar 4 sections · 4 terms · 2019–2024 3.82GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2019–2024
Compare with the course
Ravichandar vs. the course average
A
+9.1
B
−6.3
C
−2.5
D
−0.4
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Fall 2024
Overall4.69 / 5
76 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.31
Instructor clarity4.69
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.81
Instructor helpfulness4.42
Instructor availability4.59
Instructor communication4.74
Instructor effectiveness4.81
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.24
Instructor stimulates interest4.68
Sonia Chernova 7 sections · 7 terms · 2016–2025 3.79GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2016–2025
Compare with the course
Chernova vs. the course average
A
+4.7
B
−1.9
C
−1.7
D
−0.5
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2016Spring 2025
Overall4.65 / 5
103 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.34
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.71
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.62
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.67
Instructor respectfulness4.79
Assignment measured knowledge4.28
Instructor stimulates interest4.56
Matthew Gombolay 2 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2024 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Gombolay vs. the course average
A
+7.1
B
−5.9
C
−2.0
D
+0.4
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.72 / 5
255 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.18
Instructor clarity4.62
Course effectiveness4.42
Instructor enthusiasm4.78
Instructor helpfulness4.68
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.72
Instructor effectiveness4.71
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.61
Seth Hutchinson 4 sections · 4 terms · 2018–2024 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018–2024
Compare with the course
Hutchinson vs. the course average
A
+5.5
B
−5.4
C
−0.9
D
+0.7
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Spring 2024
Overall4.46 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.07
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.23
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.14
Instructor availability4.27
Instructor communication4.51
Instructor effectiveness4.52
Instructor respectfulness4.61
Assignment measured knowledge3.92
Instructor stimulates interest4.44
Frank Dellaert 5 sections · 5 terms · 2013–2025 3.61GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2013–2025
Compare with the course
Dellaert vs. the course average
A
−4.6
B
+2.0
C
+2.2
D
same
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2013Fall 2025
Overall4.20 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.77
Course effectiveness3.97
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness3.65
Instructor availability4.15
Instructor communication4.22
Instructor effectiveness4.28
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge3.77
Instructor stimulates interest4.17
Michael Stilman 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2012 3.24GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Stilman vs. the course average
A
−42.4
B
+37.2
C
+6.5
D
−0.6
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.60 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Henrik Christensen 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.44 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Gerry Chen 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.61GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.28 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity3.70
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Seyed Ahmadzadeh Esmaeilabadi 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.59GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.04 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.