Course record CS
CS 2340
Objects and Design
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
97 sections10 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score74/100
Strong
Susan Watson-Phillips 6 sections · 5 terms · 2016–2023 3.96GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2016–2023
Compare with the course
Watson-Phillips vs. the course average
A
+6.3
B
−5.1
C
−1.1
D
+0.2
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Spring 2023
Pedroguillermo Feijoogarcia 20 sections · 7 terms · 2023–2025 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 20 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Feijoogarcia vs. the course average
A
+4.3
B
−4.8
C
+0.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2023Fall 2025
Overall4.43 / 5
208 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.81
Instructor clarity4.05
Course effectiveness4.03
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.27
Instructor availability4.64
Instructor communication4.49
Instructor effectiveness4.42
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.64
Instructor stimulates interest4.12
Robert Waters 29 sections · 23 terms · 2010–2019 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 29 sections · 2010–2019
Compare with the course
Waters vs. the course average
A
−0.7
B
+0.4
C
+0.3
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Spring 2019
Overall4.54 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.98
Instructor clarity4.43
Course effectiveness4.13
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.42
Instructor availability4.64
Instructor communication4.58
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.03
Instructor stimulates interest4.23
Nimisha Roy 11 sections · 8 terms · 2023–2025 3.87GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Roy vs. the course average
A
−1.4
B
+1.8
C
−0.5
D
+0.4
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2023Fall 2025
Overall4.15 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.07
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.28
Instructor helpfulness3.88
Instructor availability4.16
Instructor communication4.51
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.21
Assignment measured knowledge3.69
Instructor stimulates interest3.78
Aibek Musaev 17 sections · 9 terms · 2020–2023 3.87GPA
Published grade shares · 17 sections · 2020–2023
Compare with the course
Musaev vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
+2.4
C
−0.4
D
+0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2020Fall 2023
Overall3.72 / 5
97 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.52
Instructor clarity3.34
Course effectiveness3.66
Instructor enthusiasm3.54
Instructor helpfulness3.66
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication3.96
Instructor effectiveness3.71
Instructor respectfulness4.12
Assignment measured knowledge3.37
Instructor stimulates interest3.33
Mark Moss 7 sections · 6 terms · 2018–2025 3.85GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2018–2025
Compare with the course
Moss vs. the course average
A
−4.2
B
+4.9
C
−0.4
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2018Summer 2025
Overall4.21 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.45
Instructor clarity3.99
Course effectiveness3.63
Instructor enthusiasm4.76
Instructor helpfulness3.94
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.03
Instructor effectiveness4.08
Instructor respectfulness4.63
Assignment measured knowledge3.31
Instructor stimulates interest3.69
Christopher Simpkins 4 sections · 4 terms · 2013–2019 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2013–2019
Compare with the course
Simpkins vs. the course average
A
−4.7
B
+1.9
C
+0.5
D
−0.2
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2013Summer 2019
Overall4.27 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.95
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness3.88
Instructor enthusiasm4.55
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.22
Instructor communication4.28
Instructor effectiveness4.22
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge3.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Junfeng Qu 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall3.38 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.00
Instructor clarity3.50
Course effectiveness3.00
Instructor enthusiasm3.50
Instructor helpfulness3.00
Instructor availability3.00
Instructor communication3.00
Instructor effectiveness3.00
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Stephanie Aravecchia 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 3.82GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Overall4.30 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.93
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm3.70
Instructor helpfulness4.33
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.17
Instructor effectiveness4.67
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge3.79
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Daniel Forsyth 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 3.81GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall3.64 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.55
Instructor clarity3.60
Course effectiveness3.50
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness3.45
Instructor availability3.85
Instructor communication3.60
Instructor effectiveness3.45
Instructor respectfulness4.10
Assignment measured knowledge3.45
Instructor stimulates interest3.20
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.