Course record CS

CS 2050R

CS 2050 Recitation

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

Grade distribution unavailable7 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2024
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 7 of 7

Frederic Faulkner 17 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.09
Instructor clarity4.24
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.23
Instructor helpfulness4.07
Instructor availability4.36
Instructor communication4.33
Instructor effectiveness4.46
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge4.07
Instructor stimulates interest4.31
Gerandy Brito 14 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.36
Instructor enthusiasm4.84
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.51
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.71
Instructor respectfulness4.64
Assignment measured knowledge4.24
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Ronnie Howard 25 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.26
Instructor clarity4.71
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.56
Instructor availability4.68
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.39
Instructor stimulates interest4.57
Ellen Zegura 22 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.94
Instructor clarity3.25
Course effectiveness4.22
Instructor enthusiasm3.76
Instructor helpfulness3.78
Instructor availability3.97
Instructor communication3.79
Instructor effectiveness3.76
Instructor respectfulness3.98
Assignment measured knowledge4.08
Instructor stimulates interest3.56
Dana Randall 33 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.83
Instructor clarity3.83
Course effectiveness4.13
Instructor enthusiasm4.25
Instructor helpfulness3.98
Instructor availability4.15
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.28
Instructor respectfulness4.33
Assignment measured knowledge4.05
Instructor stimulates interest3.85
Monica Sweat 23 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.23
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication4.52
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.02
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
Abrahim Ladha 16 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.85
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.18
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.28
Instructor communication4.18
Instructor effectiveness4.24
Instructor respectfulness3.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.07
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.