Course record CHIN
CHIN 1002
Elementary Chinese II
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
111 sections22 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score56/100
Mixed record
Hongchen Wu 6 sections · 6 terms · 2021–2025 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Wu vs. the course average
A
+14.9
B
−13.2
C
−0.8
D
−0.5
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2021Summer 2025
Overall4.92 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.47
Instructor clarity4.87
Course effectiveness4.81
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.79
Instructor availability4.94
Instructor communication4.95
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.98
Assignment measured knowledge4.49
Instructor stimulates interest4.84
Jin Liu 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2023 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022–2023
Compare with the course
Liu vs. the course average
A
+12.7
B
−10.0
C
−1.8
D
−0.5
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.76 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.78
Instructor clarity4.78
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.78
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.47
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Chao Li 28 sections · 25 terms · 2010–2025 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 28 sections · 2010–2025
Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A
+4.8
B
−2.7
C
−1.7
D
−0.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2025
Overall4.72 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.54
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.61
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.59
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.81
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.91
Assignment measured knowledge4.54
Instructor stimulates interest4.59
Wenbo Chang 5 sections · 3 terms · 2020–2022 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2020–2022
Compare with the course
Chang vs. the course average
A
+3.8
B
−2.1
C
−0.8
D
−0.5
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.72 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.73
Course effectiveness4.67
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.57
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.33
Instructor stimulates interest4.37
Mengyi Li 5 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2016–2017
Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A
+2.5
B
+0.3
C
−1.8
D
−0.5
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.28 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.53
Instructor clarity4.08
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.15
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.28
Instructor communication4.47
Instructor effectiveness4.45
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.33
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Lu Liu 4 sections · 4 terms · 2019–2023 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2019–2023
Compare with the course
Liu vs. the course average
A
+1.5
B
−2.8
C
+2.3
D
−0.5
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Spring 2023
Overall4.80 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.85
Course effectiveness4.76
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.62
Instructor availability4.74
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.81
Assignment measured knowledge4.36
Instructor stimulates interest4.78
Hsin-Wei Huang 2 sections · 2 terms · 2013–2014 3.77GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013–2014
Compare with the course
Huang vs. the course average
A
−3.6
B
+6.4
C
−1.8
D
−0.5
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.88 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.77
Instructor clarity4.77
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.97
Instructor availability4.93
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.57
Instructor stimulates interest4.77
Andrew Fields 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2013 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2013
Compare with the course
Fields vs. the course average
A
+0.3
B
−2.1
C
+1.4
D
+1.0
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.79 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Shoujin Zhou 2 sections · 1 term · 2010 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2010
Compare with the course
Zhou vs. the course average
A
−1.2
B
−1.3
C
+3.5
D
−0.5
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Lan Jin 11 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2013 3.72GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2011–2013
Compare with the course
Jin vs. the course average
A
−5.0
B
+5.3
C
+0.2
D
−0.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Spring 2013
Overall4.51 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.46
Instructor clarity4.39
Course effectiveness4.33
Instructor enthusiasm4.71
Instructor helpfulness4.22
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.52
Instructor effectiveness4.67
Instructor respectfulness4.82
Assignment measured knowledge4.33
Instructor stimulates interest4.32
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.