Course record CHEM
CHEM 3380
Synthesis Laboratory II
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
21 sections7 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2023
Flunk Score13/100
Needs workAnthony Rojas 4 sections · 4 terms · 2024–2025 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Rojas vs. the course average
A
+18.6
B
−10.7
C
−6.5
D
−1.0
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2024Fall 2025
Joseph Sadighi 7 sections · 7 terms · 2017–2023 3.57GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2017–2023
Compare with the course
Sadighi vs. the course average
A
+7.7
B
−0.3
C
−3.7
D
−2.5
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Fall 2023
Overall4.77 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.48
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.43
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.73
Instructor availability4.82
Instructor communication4.69
Instructor effectiveness4.81
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.29
Instructor stimulates interest4.74
James Morris 6 sections · 6 terms · 2010–2013 3.25GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2010–2013
Compare with the course
Morris vs. the course average
A
−5.9
B
+2.9
C
+1.1
D
+1.0
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Spring 2013
Overall4.43 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.55
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Amanda Stephens 3 sections · 3 terms · 2015–2016 2.69GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015–2016
Compare with the course
Stephens vs. the course average
A
−26.7
B
−1.7
C
+19.2
D
+7.1
F
+2.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.39 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.47
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.47
Instructor helpfulness4.42
Instructor availability4.61
Instructor communication4.27
Instructor effectiveness4.37
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge4.29
Instructor stimulates interest4.09
E Barefield 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.24GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.50 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.48
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.35
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.37
Instructor effectiveness4.58
Instructor respectfulness4.43
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.47
William Howitz 8 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.45
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Robert Braga 4 reported responses 3.58Eval / 5
Overall3.58 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.71
Instructor enthusiasm3.76
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability3.61
Instructor communication3.50
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness3.29
Instructor stimulates interest3.37
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.