Course record CHEM
CHEM 2214
Quantitative Chemical Analysis
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
7 sections6 professors
Grades: 2018–2021Evaluations: 2018–2021
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score11/100
Needs workCarrie Shepler 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2021 3.29GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020–2021
Compare with the course
Shepler vs. the course average
A
−1.5
B
−0.3
C
+1.2
D
+1.6
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.81 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Neha Garg 3 sections · 3 terms · 2019–2020 3.27GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2019–2020
Compare with the course
Garg vs. the course average
A
−3.9
B
+2.1
C
+1.5
D
same
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.25 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.13
Instructor clarity3.97
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.33
Instructor helpfulness4.03
Instructor availability4.47
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.33
Instructor respectfulness4.37
Assignment measured knowledge4.13
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Facundo Fernandez 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.61GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.84 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Ronghu Wu 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.27GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall3.13 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.10
Instructor clarity2.10
Course effectiveness2.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness2.60
Instructor availability3.70
Instructor communication3.70
Instructor effectiveness2.40
Instructor respectfulness4.10
Assignment measured knowledge3.10
Instructor stimulates interest2.40
Christy O'Mahony 5 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.29
Instructor clarity4.27
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.46
Instructor helpfulness3.94
Instructor availability4.26
Instructor communication4.37
Instructor effectiveness4.26
Instructor respectfulness4.54
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.06
Mary Peek 5 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.03
Instructor clarity4.11
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm3.93
Instructor helpfulness3.89
Instructor availability3.92
Instructor communication4.18
Instructor effectiveness4.08
Instructor respectfulness3.94
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.74
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.