Course record CHEM
CHEM 1212K
Principles of Chemistry II
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
25 sections17 professors
Grades: 2022–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score6/100
Needs work
Carrie Shepler 9 sections · 7 terms · 2022–2025 3.25GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Shepler vs. the course average
A
+8.9
B
−6.6
C
−2.8
D
−0.1
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2022Fall 2025
Overall4.55 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.19
Instructor clarity4.49
Course effectiveness4.38
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.42
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.56
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.17
Instructor stimulates interest4.38
John Zhang 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2024 3.24GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A
−1.4
B
+6.7
C
−2.4
D
−1.3
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.52 / 5
128 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.05
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.17
Instructor helpfulness3.14
Instructor availability3.66
Instructor communication3.48
Instructor effectiveness3.34
Instructor respectfulness4.09
Assignment measured knowledge3.53
Instructor stimulates interest3.18
Michael Roy 2 sections · 1 term · 2024 3.20GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024
Compare with the course
Roy vs. the course average
A
+13.3
B
−9.3
C
−8.9
D
−2.5
F
+7.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.79 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.29
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.21
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.63
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge2.98
Instructor stimulates interest4.78
Eric Shen 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.14GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Shen vs. the course average
A
−4.6
B
+4.6
C
+2.9
D
−1.3
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Michael Evans 3 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2025 3.05GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Evans vs. the course average
A
−12.9
B
+10.5
C
+4.9
D
−0.5
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.35 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.03
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness4.22
Instructor enthusiasm4.52
Instructor helpfulness4.22
Instructor availability4.33
Instructor communication4.38
Instructor effectiveness4.41
Instructor respectfulness4.47
Assignment measured knowledge3.96
Instructor stimulates interest4.13
Joseph Sadighi 2 sections · 1 term · 2025 2.97GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Sadighi vs. the course average
A
−14.0
B
+2.3
C
+15.8
D
−1.5
F
−2.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.36 / 5
95 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.05
Course effectiveness4.13
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.08
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.28
Instructor effectiveness4.25
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.08
Deborah Santos 3 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2024 2.94GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Santos vs. the course average
A
−8.3
B
+2.7
C
−0.5
D
+5.3
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.31 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.71
Instructor clarity2.91
Course effectiveness3.93
Instructor enthusiasm3.30
Instructor helpfulness3.10
Instructor availability3.85
Instructor communication3.60
Instructor effectiveness3.26
Instructor respectfulness3.37
Assignment measured knowledge3.54
Instructor stimulates interest3.10
Amanda Stephens 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.43GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.03 / 5
132 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Anh Le 4 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.23
Instructor availability4.67
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Christy O'Mahony 6 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.57
Instructor helpfulness4.23
Instructor availability4.18
Instructor communication4.33
Instructor effectiveness4.42
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge3.82
Instructor stimulates interest4.43
Angus Wilkinson 232 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
232 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Jake Soper 81 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
81 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.86
Instructor clarity4.33
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.76
Instructor helpfulness3.77
Instructor availability4.32
Instructor communication4.27
Instructor effectiveness4.38
Instructor respectfulness4.42
Assignment measured knowledge3.67
Instructor stimulates interest4.23
Henry La Pierre 196 reported responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5
196 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity3.60
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness3.40
Instructor availability3.90
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Kimberly Schurmeier 148 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
148 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.27
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.34
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.26
Instructor availability4.48
Instructor communication4.54
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.45
Assignment measured knowledge4.04
Instructor stimulates interest4.29
M.G. Finn 196 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
196 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Cianan Russell 125 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
125 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.06
Instructor clarity4.44
Course effectiveness4.03
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.24
Instructor availability4.54
Instructor communication4.36
Instructor effectiveness4.56
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Assignment measured knowledge3.86
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Leigh Bottomley 23 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.86
Instructor clarity3.67
Course effectiveness3.83
Instructor enthusiasm3.97
Instructor helpfulness3.61
Instructor availability3.65
Instructor communication3.88
Instructor effectiveness3.68
Instructor respectfulness3.88
Assignment measured knowledge3.44
Instructor stimulates interest3.45
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.