Course record CHBE
CHBE 4530
Capstone ChBE Bio-Design
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
39 sections8 professors
Grades: 2015–2025Evaluations: 2015–2023
Flunk Score14/100
Needs work
Peter Ludovice 8 sections · 8 terms · 2015–2023 3.55GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2015–2023
Compare with the course
Ludovice vs. the course average
A
+15.3
B
−13.0
C
−1.8
D
−0.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2015Spring 2023
Overall3.64 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity3.45
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm3.87
Instructor helpfulness3.65
Instructor availability3.13
Instructor communication3.45
Instructor effectiveness3.95
Instructor respectfulness4.15
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.45
Francis Schork 6 sections · 5 terms · 2016–2019 3.43GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2016–2019
Compare with the course
Schork vs. the course average
A
+4.7
B
−4.1
C
+0.3
D
−1.0
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2016Spring 2019
Overall3.29 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.05
Instructor clarity3.22
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm3.78
Instructor helpfulness2.72
Instructor availability3.18
Instructor communication3.17
Instructor effectiveness3.30
Instructor respectfulness3.63
Assignment measured knowledge4.15
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Christian Cuba-Torres 6 sections · 6 terms · 2017–2024 3.38GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2017–2024
Compare with the course
Cuba-Torres vs. the course average
A
+0.3
B
−0.8
C
+1.5
D
−1.0
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Spring 2024
Overall4.38 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.16
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness4.72
Instructor availability4.46
Instructor communication4.36
Instructor effectiveness4.42
Instructor respectfulness4.76
Instructor stimulates interest4.06
Yonathan Thio 8 sections · 7 terms · 2015–2021 3.36GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2015–2021
Compare with the course
Thio vs. the course average
A
+2.8
B
−3.0
C
−2.9
D
+3.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2015Summer 2021
Overall4.66 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.65
Instructor clarity4.58
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.52
Instructor availability4.66
Instructor communication4.62
Instructor effectiveness4.76
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.48
Matthew Realff 5 sections · 5 terms · 2015–2025 3.27GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2015–2025
Compare with the course
Realff vs. the course average
A
−3.6
B
−3.3
C
+7.8
D
−1.0
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2015Spring 2025
Overall4.28 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.83
Instructor clarity4.46
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.39
Instructor helpfulness4.16
Instructor availability4.27
Instructor communication4.24
Instructor effectiveness4.49
Instructor respectfulness4.14
Assignment measured knowledge3.33
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Christopher Luettgen 4 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2020 3.08GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Luettgen vs. the course average
A
−34.1
B
+38.7
C
−3.6
D
−1.0
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Andreas Bommarius 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.30GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall3.19 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.30
Instructor clarity3.60
Course effectiveness2.80
Instructor enthusiasm3.17
Instructor helpfulness2.93
Instructor availability3.15
Instructor communication2.93
Instructor effectiveness3.27
Instructor respectfulness3.17
Assignment measured knowledge2.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.27
Yoshiaki Kawajiri 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall3.22 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity3.00
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm3.60
Instructor helpfulness1.93
Instructor availability3.70
Instructor communication3.53
Instructor effectiveness3.00
Instructor respectfulness3.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.13
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.