Course record CHBE
CHBE 4505
Process Design and Economics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
11 sections6 professors
Grades: 2010–2014Evaluations: 2012–2014
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score3/100
Needs work
Andreas Bommarius 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2012 3.31GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Bommarius vs. the course average
A
+13.4
B
+1.5
C
−13.5
D
−0.3
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.81 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness3.70
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness3.80
Instructor availability3.50
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness3.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Francis Schork 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014 2.93GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014
Compare with the course
Schork vs. the course average
A
−4.1
B
+1.0
C
+1.0
D
+2.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.92 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.55
Instructor clarity3.75
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness3.65
Instructor availability4.38
Instructor communication3.83
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.22
Assignment measured knowledge3.75
Instructor stimulates interest3.42
Matthew Realff 4 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2014 2.91GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2012–2014
Compare with the course
Realff vs. the course average
A
−3.6
B
−3.2
C
+6.2
D
+0.4
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.42 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.42
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.38
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Peter Ludovice 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2013 2.88GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2013
Compare with the course
Ludovice vs. the course average
A
−7.1
B
+1.5
C
+6.0
D
−1.8
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.80 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.57
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness3.53
Instructor availability3.83
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.73
Yoshiaki Kawajiri 1 sections · 1 term · 2010 · Limited sample 3.30GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2010 · Limited sample
Yonathan Thio 31 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.05
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Instructor stimulates interest3.95
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.