Course record CHBE
CHBE 3210
Transport Processes II
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
54 sections12 professors
Grades: 2010–2024Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score1/100
Needs work
Laurens Breedveld 13 sections · 13 terms · 2011–2024 2.86GPA
Published grade shares · 13 sections · 2011–2024
Compare with the course
Breedveld vs. the course average
A
+8.3
B
−4.7
C
−3.4
D
+0.1
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Summer 2024
Overall4.49 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.62
Course effectiveness4.58
Instructor enthusiasm4.62
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.66
Instructor respectfulness4.43
Assignment measured knowledge4.15
Instructor stimulates interest4.19
Martin Maldovan 8 sections · 8 terms · 2015–2023 2.84GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2015–2023
Compare with the course
Maldovan vs. the course average
A
+2.5
B
+1.8
C
−1.7
D
−2.3
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2015Fall 2023
Overall4.50 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.45
Instructor clarity4.54
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.12
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.58
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.39
Ravi Kane 2 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2022 2.84GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016–2022
Compare with the course
Kane vs. the course average
A
−2.6
B
+10.0
C
−2.0
D
−6.0
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.41 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.33
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.13
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.43
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.73
Assignment measured knowledge4.05
Instructor stimulates interest4.07
Hang Lu 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2023 2.81GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2023
Compare with the course
Lu vs. the course average
A
+5.9
B
−2.8
C
−5.0
D
+2.4
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.68 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.96
Instructor clarity3.35
Course effectiveness3.56
Instructor enthusiasm4.06
Instructor helpfulness3.43
Instructor availability4.22
Instructor communication3.68
Instructor effectiveness3.63
Instructor respectfulness3.81
Assignment measured knowledge3.25
Instructor stimulates interest3.26
Thomas Fuller 5 sections · 5 terms · 2011–2014 2.75GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2011–2014
Compare with the course
Fuller vs. the course average
A
−3.0
B
+7.7
C
−3.2
D
−2.6
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2014
Lily Cheung 4 sections · 4 terms · 2017–2023 2.68GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2017–2023
Compare with the course
Cheung vs. the course average
A
−4.2
B
−0.6
C
+5.4
D
+1.7
F
−2.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Summer 2023
Overall3.71 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.04
Instructor clarity3.34
Course effectiveness3.67
Instructor enthusiasm4.06
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.46
Instructor communication3.53
Instructor effectiveness3.49
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.27
Instructor stimulates interest3.14
Sven Behrens 6 sections · 6 terms · 2010–2019 2.54GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2010–2019
Compare with the course
Behrens vs. the course average
A
−14.4
B
+8.2
C
+6.2
D
+0.9
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Spring 2019
Overall4.58 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.53
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.37
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.67
Instructor communication4.53
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.17
Instructor stimulates interest4.42
Michelle Dawson 9 sections · 9 terms · 2010–2014 2.49GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2010–2014
Compare with the course
Dawson vs. the course average
A
−5.7
B
−4.5
C
+3.4
D
+4.4
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2014
Overall4.08 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.36
Instructor clarity4.08
Course effectiveness4.12
Instructor enthusiasm4.22
Instructor helpfulness3.78
Instructor availability4.28
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.16
Instructor respectfulness4.16
Assignment measured knowledge3.94
Instructor stimulates interest3.76
Sandra Pettit 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.56 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Andreas Bommarius 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 2.90GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall3.87 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.93
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.27
Instructor helpfulness3.47
Instructor availability3.70
Instructor communication4.03
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness3.83
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.