Course record CHBE
CHBE 3130
Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics II
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
40 sections15 professors
Grades: 2013–2024Evaluations: 2013–2024
Flunk Score5/100
Needs work
Natalie Stingelin 2 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2020 3.69GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Stingelin vs. the course average
A
+32.2
B
−11.6
C
−15.9
D
−3.4
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall1.79 / 5
76 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.10
Instructor clarity1.60
Course effectiveness1.90
Instructor enthusiasm2.50
Instructor helpfulness1.50
Instructor availability2.00
Instructor communication1.40
Instructor effectiveness1.40
Instructor respectfulness2.20
Assignment measured knowledge2.70
Instructor stimulates interest1.70
Corey Wilson 6 sections · 6 terms · 2017–2022 3.26GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2017–2022
Compare with the course
Wilson vs. the course average
A
+5.4
B
−0.2
C
−1.2
D
−2.7
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Summer 2022
Overall4.53 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.28
Instructor clarity4.49
Course effectiveness4.48
Instructor enthusiasm4.71
Instructor helpfulness4.31
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.61
Instructor effectiveness4.54
Instructor respectfulness4.74
Assignment measured knowledge4.38
Instructor stimulates interest4.31
Thomas Fuller 2 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2021 3.23GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015–2021
Compare with the course
Fuller vs. the course average
A
−6.5
B
+18.5
C
−6.8
D
−3.9
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
James Meredith 7 sections · 7 terms · 2013–2021 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2013–2021
Compare with the course
Meredith vs. the course average
A
+8.0
B
−4.0
C
−4.0
D
−0.7
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Spring 2021
Overall4.57 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.26
Instructor clarity4.76
Course effectiveness4.64
Instructor enthusiasm4.41
Instructor helpfulness4.48
Instructor availability4.59
Instructor communication4.59
Instructor effectiveness4.72
Instructor respectfulness4.81
Assignment measured knowledge4.46
Instructor stimulates interest4.21
Alex Abramson 3 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2024 3.17GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Abramson vs. the course average
A
+4.1
B
−1.6
C
−4.4
D
+3.1
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.36 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.32
Instructor clarity4.33
Course effectiveness4.18
Instructor enthusiasm4.52
Instructor helpfulness3.88
Instructor availability4.48
Instructor communication4.39
Instructor effectiveness4.45
Instructor respectfulness4.68
Assignment measured knowledge3.45
Instructor stimulates interest4.12
Ryan Lively 3 sections · 3 terms · 2016–2023 3.05GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2016–2023
Compare with the course
Lively vs. the course average
A
−5.0
B
+4.7
C
+0.3
D
−0.8
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.61 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.33
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.36
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.04
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.68
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.09
Instructor stimulates interest4.44
Sven Behrens 2 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2016 2.98GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015–2016
Compare with the course
Behrens vs. the course average
A
−18.1
B
+22.0
C
−2.3
D
−1.9
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.47 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
Yonathan Thio 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022 2.97GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022
Compare with the course
Thio vs. the course average
A
−0.8
B
−7.3
C
+3.4
D
+4.9
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.76 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.65
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.55
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Christian Cuba-Torres 4 sections · 4 terms · 2019–2021 2.95GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2019–2021
Compare with the course
Cuba-Torres vs. the course average
A
−6.3
B
−0.3
C
+4.0
D
+2.9
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2019Summer 2021
Overall4.69 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.58
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.63
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.72
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.38
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Yulin Deng 3 sections · 3 terms · 2014 2.83GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2014
Compare with the course
Deng vs. the course average
A
−13.6
B
−1.6
C
+15.4
D
+0.5
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.65 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.75
Instructor clarity3.06
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm3.80
Instructor helpfulness3.54
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication3.66
Instructor effectiveness3.58
Instructor respectfulness4.42
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.