Course record CETL

CETL 8000

Graduate Teaching Assistant Preparation

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

Grade distribution unavailable35 professors
Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 35 of 35

Shelby Ellis 9 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Christina Ragan 7 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Rodrigo Borela Valente 15 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.82
Instructor clarity4.94
Course effectiveness4.42
Instructor enthusiasm4.96
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.96
Instructor effectiveness4.96
Instructor respectfulness4.99
Assignment measured knowledge4.12
Instructor stimulates interest4.72
Christian Cuba-Torres 2 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.25
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Samantha Wilson 8 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.79
Course effectiveness4.54
Instructor enthusiasm4.82
Instructor helpfulness4.58
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.79
Instructor effectiveness4.82
Instructor respectfulness4.82
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Emily Alicea-Munoz 10 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.05
Instructor clarity4.86
Course effectiveness4.46
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.76
Instructor availability4.84
Instructor communication4.95
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.02
Instructor stimulates interest4.38
Zachary Handlos 9 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.86
Instructor helpfulness4.76
Instructor availability4.78
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.72
William Howitz 20 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.95
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness2.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge3.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Lakshmi Raju 18 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Onur Birol 2 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Emily Weigel 3 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.08
Instructor clarity4.88
Course effectiveness4.82
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.72
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.68
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.05
Instructor stimulates interest4.48
Klara Grodzinsky 6 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.92
Instructor clarity4.79
Course effectiveness4.42
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.79
Assignment measured knowledge4.24
Instructor stimulates interest4.49
Carrie Shepler 19 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.42
Instructor clarity4.59
Course effectiveness3.61
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.53
Instructor availability4.79
Instructor communication4.77
Instructor effectiveness4.64
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge3.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.09
Shana Kerr 7 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.83
Instructor clarity4.51
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.76
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.69
Instructor effectiveness4.61
Instructor respectfulness4.74
Assignment measured knowledge3.98
Instructor stimulates interest4.33
Frederic Faulkner 16 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Olufisayo Omojokun 17 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.74
Instructor clarity4.56
Course effectiveness4.14
Instructor enthusiasm4.45
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.54
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.69
Assignment measured knowledge4.22
Instructor stimulates interest4.33
Colin Harrison 9 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness3.30
Instructor availability4.05
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Daniela Staiculescu 24 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.64
Instructor clarity4.49
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.64
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.59
Instructor communication4.61
Instructor effectiveness4.58
Instructor respectfulness4.68
Assignment measured knowledge3.85
Instructor stimulates interest4.29
Heather Chilton 8 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Kimberly Schurmeier 15 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity4.38
Course effectiveness3.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.45
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.58
Instructor effectiveness4.15
Instructor respectfulness4.13
Assignment measured knowledge3.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.92
David Garton 10 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
Hang Shao 22 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Christine Spencer 2 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.72
Sandra Pettit 4 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.55
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge3.75
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Melinda Millard-Stafford 7 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Dana Hartley 9 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
John Bardill 9 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Andrew Scherbakov 8 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness3.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Mark Guzdial 17 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
H. Venkateswaran 21 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Deborah Santos 23 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.07
Instructor enthusiasm4.17
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication4.31
Instructor effectiveness4.17
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.32
Mioy Huynh 23 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.59
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.42
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Instructor stimulates interest3.75
Martha Grover 19 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.25
Instructor clarity4.78
Course effectiveness3.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.89
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness4.86
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.78
Joseph Scott 19 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.88
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication4.91
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.91
Instructor stimulates interest4.83
Anjuli Datta 6 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.00
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.