Course record CEE
CEE 8095
Research Seminar in Environmental Engineering
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
Grade distribution unavailable12 professors
Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataThis course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Mustafa Aral 4 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.93
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.93
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.87
Instructor stimulates interest4.93
John Crittenden 6 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Ching-Hua Huang 13 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Marc Stieglitz 4 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Spyros Pavlostathis 13 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Jaehong Kim 13 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
James Mulholland 17 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Yongsheng Chen 13 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Sotira Yiacoumi 13 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Michael Bergin 17 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.