Course record CEE
CEE 4600
Transportation Planning, Operations, and Design
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
72 sections12 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work
Yi-Chang Tsai 2 sections · 1 term · 2020 3.97GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020
Compare with the course
Tsai vs. the course average
A
+43.3
B
−35.6
C
−6.2
D
−1.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Georgene Geary 2 sections · 1 term · 2021 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2021
Compare with the course
Geary vs. the course average
A
+40.8
B
−33.1
C
−6.2
D
−1.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.67 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Hongyu Lu 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2024 3.77GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Lu vs. the course average
A
+27.6
B
−24.4
C
−1.6
D
−1.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.38 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.19
Instructor clarity4.19
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.41
Instructor availability4.64
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.46
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge4.08
Instructor stimulates interest3.92
Thomas Wall 4 sections · 2 terms · 2012–2014 3.54GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2012–2014
Compare with the course
Wall vs. the course average
A
+5.6
B
−2.9
C
−1.2
D
−1.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.04 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability3.50
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Michael Hunter 3 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2025 3.49GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Hunter vs. the course average
A
+6.1
B
−4.1
C
−4.1
D
+1.8
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.59 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.66
Course effectiveness4.61
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.24
Instructor availability4.43
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Assignment measured knowledge4.49
Instructor stimulates interest4.57
Aaron Greenwood 2 sections · 1 term · 2013 3.37GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013
Compare with the course
Greenwood vs. the course average
A
−4.7
B
+1.0
C
+5.2
D
−1.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.05
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.05
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.25
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
John Luh 26 sections · 15 terms · 2010–2023 3.29GPA
Published grade shares · 26 sections · 2010–2023
Compare with the course
Luh vs. the course average
A
−12.6
B
+10.6
C
+1.8
D
+0.3
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2023
Overall4.31 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.54
Instructor clarity4.12
Course effectiveness4.46
Instructor enthusiasm4.49
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.31
Instructor communication4.39
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.33
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.09
Yanzhi Xu 2 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.12GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Xu vs. the course average
A
−16.6
B
+1.9
C
+13.3
D
+1.8
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.58 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity3.10
Course effectiveness3.60
Instructor enthusiasm3.60
Instructor helpfulness3.00
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication3.60
Instructor effectiveness3.40
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.10
Haobing Liu 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.89GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall4.48 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.37
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm3.93
Instructor helpfulness4.57
Instructor availability4.73
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.73
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.73
Instructor stimulates interest4.07
Angshuman Guin 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.58GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall2.87 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity2.50
Course effectiveness3.20
Instructor enthusiasm2.90
Instructor helpfulness2.80
Instructor availability3.47
Instructor communication3.20
Instructor effectiveness2.53
Instructor respectfulness3.73
Assignment measured knowledge3.63
Instructor stimulates interest1.83
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.