Course record BMED

BMED 4853

Special Topics

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

14 sections10 professors
Grades: 2020–2025Evaluations: 2020–2022
Flunk Score24/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 10

William Singhose 5 sections · 5 terms · 2020–2025 3.71GPA
72.0% A
26.6% B
1.4% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2020–2025

Compare with the course
Singhose vs. the course average
A +12.7
B −7.0
C −4.6
D −0.9
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2020Fall 2025
Michelle Laplaca 6 sections · 6 terms · 2020–2022 3.37GPA
48.9% A
40.6% B
8.7% C
1.5% D
0.3% F

Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2020–2022

Compare with the course
Laplaca vs. the course average
A −10.4
B +6.9
C +2.6
D +0.7
F +0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2020Fall 2022
Annabelle Singer 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 3.85GPA
85.0% A
15.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample

Hannah Song 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.52GPA
56.0% A
40.0% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample

Frank Hammond 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.02GPA
32.2% A
41.1% B
23.3% C
3.3% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample

Kyla Ross 84 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

84 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge3.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Bilal Haider 71 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

71 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.15
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge3.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
Shalu Suri 72 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

72 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.47
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.63
Instructor communication4.53
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
David Frakes 5 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.38
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.33
Instructor effectiveness4.38
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
T. Nichols 78 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

78 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity3.95
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.05
Instructor effectiveness4.25
Instructor respectfulness4.45
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.