Course record BMED
BMED 4853
Special Topics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
14 sections10 professors
Grades: 2020–2025Evaluations: 2020–2022
Flunk Score24/100
Below averageWilliam Singhose 5 sections · 5 terms · 2020–2025 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2020–2025
Compare with the course
Singhose vs. the course average
A
+12.7
B
−7.0
C
−4.6
D
−0.9
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2020Fall 2025
Overall4.35 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.98
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.67
Instructor helpfulness3.45
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication3.92
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge3.27
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Michelle Laplaca 6 sections · 6 terms · 2020–2022 3.37GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2020–2022
Compare with the course
Laplaca vs. the course average
A
−10.4
B
+6.9
C
+2.6
D
+0.7
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2020Fall 2022
Overall3.66 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.34
Instructor clarity3.36
Course effectiveness4.04
Instructor enthusiasm3.74
Instructor helpfulness3.43
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.79
Instructor respectfulness3.60
Assignment measured knowledge3.38
Instructor stimulates interest3.60
Annabelle Singer 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 3.85GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall4.32 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.55
Instructor clarity4.22
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.13
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.38
Instructor effectiveness4.38
Instructor respectfulness4.58
Assignment measured knowledge3.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.17
Hannah Song 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.52GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.43 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.13
Course effectiveness4.23
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.56
Instructor communication4.34
Instructor effectiveness4.49
Instructor respectfulness4.69
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.26
Frank Hammond 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.02GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Kyla Ross 84 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
84 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge3.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Bilal Haider 71 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.15
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge3.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
Shalu Suri 72 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
72 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.47
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.63
Instructor communication4.53
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
David Frakes 5 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.38
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.33
Instructor effectiveness4.38
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
T. Nichols 78 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity3.95
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.05
Instructor effectiveness4.25
Instructor respectfulness4.45
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.