Course record BMED

BMED 3410

Introduction to Biomechanics

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

19 sections10 professors
Grades: 2020–2025Evaluations: 2020–2024
Flunk Score7/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 10

Fatiesa Sulejmani 3 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2023 3.25GPA
50.0% A
30.0% B
17.0% C
0.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2022–2023

Compare with the course
Sulejmani vs. the course average
A +4.1
B −4.8
C +2.4
D −3.0
F +1.3

Difference in percentage points.

Denis Tsygankov 9 sections · 9 terms · 2020–2025 3.17GPA
47.0% A
30.6% B
16.4% C
4.8% D
1.2% F

Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2020–2025

Compare with the course
Tsygankov vs. the course average
A +1.1
B −4.2
C +1.8
D +1.8
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Summer 2020Fall 2025
Cheng Zhu 5 sections · 5 terms · 2022–2025 3.16GPA
38.4% A
46.1% B
11.5% C
1.9% D
2.1% F

Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2022–2025

Compare with the course
Zhu vs. the course average
A −7.5
B +11.2
C −3.2
D −1.0
F +0.5

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2022Summer 2025
Wei Sun 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.43GPA
61.2% A
24.5% B
10.2% C
3.1% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample

Scott Hollister 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.33GPA
45.8% A
41.7% B
12.5% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample

Charles Kemp 90 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

90 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Costas Arvanitis 71 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5

71 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.42
Instructor clarity3.42
Course effectiveness3.01
Instructor enthusiasm4.25
Instructor helpfulness3.23
Instructor availability3.98
Instructor communication3.70
Instructor effectiveness3.73
Instructor respectfulness3.97
Assignment measured knowledge2.09
Instructor stimulates interest3.48
Esfandiar Behravesh 20 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.95
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication4.95
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.55
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
Jaydev Desai 81 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

81 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.17
Instructor clarity3.72
Course effectiveness4.09
Instructor enthusiasm4.17
Instructor helpfulness3.66
Instructor availability4.39
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness4.01
Instructor respectfulness3.81
Assignment measured knowledge3.69
Instructor stimulates interest3.69
Yue Chen 89 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5

89 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.59
Instructor clarity3.02
Course effectiveness3.79
Instructor enthusiasm4.24
Instructor helpfulness3.76
Instructor availability4.44
Instructor communication3.94
Instructor effectiveness3.83
Instructor respectfulness4.54
Assignment measured knowledge2.33
Instructor stimulates interest3.43
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.