Course record BIOL
BIOL 2344
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
37 sections10 professors
Grades: 2010–2020Evaluations: 2012–2020
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score2/100
Needs work
Mirjana Brockett 12 sections · 11 terms · 2010–2020 3.06GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2010–2020
Compare with the course
Brockett vs. the course average
A
+5.2
B
−1.4
C
−2.7
D
−0.3
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2020
Overall4.37 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.28
Instructor clarity3.92
Course effectiveness4.12
Instructor enthusiasm4.76
Instructor helpfulness4.11
Instructor availability4.61
Instructor communication4.27
Instructor effectiveness4.31
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge3.88
Instructor stimulates interest4.07
Patrick Mcgrath 4 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2020 3.02GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Mcgrath vs. the course average
A
+3.2
B
−1.4
C
−0.1
D
−2.2
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.72 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.13
Instructor clarity3.66
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm3.75
Instructor helpfulness3.56
Instructor availability3.81
Instructor communication3.85
Instructor effectiveness3.74
Instructor respectfulness4.09
Assignment measured knowledge3.77
Instructor stimulates interest3.29
John Mcdonald 10 sections · 10 terms · 2011–2019 2.95GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2011–2019
Compare with the course
Mcdonald vs. the course average
A
−1.0
B
+2.8
C
−2.5
D
+0.6
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Fall 2019
Overall4.36 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.23
Instructor clarity4.41
Course effectiveness4.23
Instructor enthusiasm4.34
Instructor helpfulness4.29
Instructor availability4.21
Instructor communication4.54
Instructor effectiveness4.33
Instructor respectfulness4.59
Assignment measured knowledge4.04
Instructor stimulates interest4.16
Michael Goodisman 7 sections · 7 terms · 2012–2019 2.80GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2012–2019
Compare with the course
Goodisman vs. the course average
A
−5.4
B
−2.7
C
+6.9
D
+0.6
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2012Fall 2019
Overall4.20 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.04
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness3.74
Instructor enthusiasm4.56
Instructor helpfulness3.96
Instructor availability4.03
Instructor communication4.31
Instructor effectiveness4.26
Instructor respectfulness4.17
Assignment measured knowledge3.63
Instructor stimulates interest3.99
Terry Snell 2 sections · 1 term · 2017 2.75GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017
Compare with the course
Snell vs. the course average
A
−15.3
B
+9.5
C
+6.0
D
+0.7
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.04 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.75
Instructor clarity3.95
Course effectiveness3.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.25
Instructor communication3.85
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Kirill Lobachev 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 3.07GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.14 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Raphael Rosenzweig 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 2.78GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.49 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Joseph Lachance 36 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Matthew Torres 19 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.53
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.03
Instructor availability4.17
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.43
Instructor respectfulness4.53
Instructor stimulates interest4.17
Shana Kerr 21 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness3.40
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.