Course record BIOL
BIOL 1510
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
36 sections12 professors
Grades: 2010–2020Evaluations: 2012–2020
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score5/100
Needs work
Emily Weigel 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2019 3.60GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2019
Compare with the course
Weigel vs. the course average
A
+26.8
B
−12.2
C
−11.0
D
−2.5
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.72 / 5
191 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity4.68
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.82
Instructor helpfulness4.62
Instructor availability4.74
Instructor communication4.76
Instructor effectiveness4.74
Instructor respectfulness4.82
Assignment measured knowledge4.43
Instructor stimulates interest4.56
Shana Kerr 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2020 3.46GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Kerr vs. the course average
A
+17.1
B
−6.7
C
−8.1
D
−1.1
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.54 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.43
Instructor clarity4.58
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.44
Instructor communication4.51
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.42
Christine Spencer 2 sections · 2 terms · 2013–2016 3.20GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013–2016
Compare with the course
Spencer vs. the course average
A
+2.7
B
+0.4
C
−2.4
D
−0.5
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.02 / 5
163 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.65
Instructor clarity3.99
Course effectiveness3.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.66
Instructor helpfulness3.63
Instructor availability4.11
Instructor communication3.93
Instructor effectiveness3.94
Instructor respectfulness4.23
Assignment measured knowledge3.38
Instructor stimulates interest3.66
Jung Choi 16 sections · 12 terms · 2010–2020 3.09GPA
Published grade shares · 16 sections · 2010–2020
Compare with the course
Choi vs. the course average
A
−4.4
B
+3.7
C
+0.6
D
−0.2
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Spring 2020
Overall4.03 / 5
182 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.89
Instructor clarity3.79
Course effectiveness3.89
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness3.68
Instructor availability4.09
Instructor communication4.02
Instructor effectiveness3.94
Instructor respectfulness4.35
Assignment measured knowledge3.83
Instructor stimulates interest3.74
David Garton 7 sections · 7 terms · 2010–2016 3.05GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2010–2016
Compare with the course
Garton vs. the course average
A
−1.1
B
−4.8
C
+4.4
D
+1.6
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2016
Overall3.65 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.03
Instructor clarity3.95
Course effectiveness3.78
Instructor enthusiasm4.25
Instructor helpfulness3.18
Instructor availability3.72
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness3.68
Instructor respectfulness3.12
Assignment measured knowledge3.68
Instructor stimulates interest3.42
Jennifer Leavey 4 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2014 2.93GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2014
Compare with the course
Leavey vs. the course average
A
−11.7
B
+6.3
C
+3.5
D
+1.0
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.05 / 5
163 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.03
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness3.57
Instructor availability4.13
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.27
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Eric Gaucher 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 2.93GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall3.50 / 5
156 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity3.63
Course effectiveness3.40
Instructor enthusiasm3.40
Instructor helpfulness3.40
Instructor availability3.67
Instructor communication3.50
Instructor effectiveness3.50
Instructor respectfulness3.73
Assignment measured knowledge3.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.13
Michael Goodisman 112 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
112 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness3.75
Instructor availability4.05
Instructor communication4.15
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.15
Colin Harrison 14 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.09
Instructor clarity4.39
Course effectiveness4.27
Instructor enthusiasm4.62
Instructor helpfulness4.42
Instructor availability4.43
Instructor communication4.49
Instructor effectiveness4.47
Instructor respectfulness4.63
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.29
Raphael Rosenzweig 116 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
116 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.70
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.