Course record BC
BC 8823
Special Topics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
21 sections10 professors
Grades: 2010–2024Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Scott Braley 2 sections · 2 terms · 2012–2013 3.69GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2012–2013
Compare with the course
Braley vs. the course average
A
−1.7
B
+2.8
C
−1.1
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.90 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Thomas Keel 5 sections · 5 terms · 2010–2017 3.67GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2010–2017
Compare with the course
Keel vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
+4.6
C
−1.1
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2017
Overall3.85 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.08
Instructor enthusiasm3.83
Instructor helpfulness3.33
Instructor availability3.88
Instructor communication3.83
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness4.45
Assignment measured knowledge3.38
Instructor stimulates interest3.63
Richard Porter 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2014 3.63GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2014
Compare with the course
Porter vs. the course average
A
−4.8
B
+3.7
C
+1.2
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2014
Overall4.50 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.37
Instructor helpfulness4.57
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.77
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.27
Walter Parker 5 sections · 5 terms · 2011–2013 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2011–2013
Compare with the course
Parker vs. the course average
A
−9.1
B
+10.2
C
−1.1
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Fall 2013
Overall4.74 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.53
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.67
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.13
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Jochen Teizer 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample
Dayana Costa 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.78 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Ioannis Brilakis 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample
Daniel Lemieux 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Overall4.93 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.86
Instructor clarity4.94
Course effectiveness4.86
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.94
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.38
Instructor stimulates interest4.83
Xinyi Song 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.57GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.88 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Ece Skourup 9 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.