Course record ARCH
ARCH 8866
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
30 sections15 professors
Grades: 2017–2020Evaluations: 2017–2019
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score48/100
Mixed record
Lars Spuybroek 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2020 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Spuybroek vs. the course average
A
+21.0
B
−14.4
C
−6.0
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.47 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness3.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Michael Gamble 2 sections · 2 terms · 2019–2020 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019–2020
Compare with the course
Gamble vs. the course average
A
+21.0
B
−14.4
C
−6.0
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.95 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Ellen Dunham-Jones 2 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2020 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017–2020
Compare with the course
Dunham-Jones vs. the course average
A
+21.0
B
−14.4
C
−6.0
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Richard Dagenhart 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2019 3.73GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Dagenhart vs. the course average
A
+14.4
B
−14.4
C
−6.0
D
same
F
+6.0
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.83 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Debora Mesa Molina 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2020 3.73GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Molina vs. the course average
A
−6.3
B
+13.0
C
−6.0
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.47 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.45
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Keith Kaseman 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2019 3.66GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2019
Compare with the course
Kaseman vs. the course average
A
−10.0
B
+13.3
C
−2.7
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.78 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.53
Course effectiveness4.73
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.73
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.53
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.47
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Athanassios Economou 2 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2019 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017–2019
Compare with the course
Economou vs. the course average
A
−8.5
B
+6.6
C
+2.5
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.40 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.85
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.15
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication3.75
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
John Peponis 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2019 3.57GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2019
Compare with the course
Peponis vs. the course average
A
−15.6
B
+15.6
C
+0.7
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.81 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.73
Instructor clarity4.77
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge4.47
Instructor stimulates interest4.93
Daniel Baerlecken 4 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2018 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2017–2018
Compare with the course
Baerlecken vs. the course average
A
−23.5
B
−3.1
C
+27.3
D
same
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.82 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.85
Instructor clarity4.85
Course effectiveness4.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Perry Yang 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.70 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.