Course record ARCH
ARCH 6052
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
23 sections10 professors
Grades: 2011–2015Evaluations: 2012–2015
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work
Charles Rudolph 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2015 3.72GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2015
Compare with the course
Rudolph vs. the course average
A
+15.1
B
−5.6
C
−7.1
D
−0.9
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2015
Overall4.13 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.03
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.43
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness3.17
Instructor availability3.67
Instructor communication4.37
Instructor effectiveness4.33
Instructor respectfulness4.43
Assignment measured knowledge3.87
Instructor stimulates interest3.83
Michael Gamble 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2013 3.67GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2013
Compare with the course
Gamble vs. the course average
A
+8.0
B
+3.6
C
−9.1
D
−0.9
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.83 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
David Green 2 sections · 2 terms · 2012–2013 3.63GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2012–2013
Compare with the course
Green vs. the course average
A
+7.6
B
−0.1
C
−5.1
D
−0.9
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.49 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.35
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
William Leblanc 4 sections · 4 terms · 2012–2015 3.39GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2012–2015
Compare with the course
Leblanc vs. the course average
A
+1.4
B
−4.1
C
+0.1
D
+1.6
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2012Spring 2015
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.47
Instructor clarity4.28
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.67
Instructor helpfulness4.22
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.38
Assignment measured knowledge4.58
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Minjung Maing 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2012 3.38GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Maing vs. the course average
A
−4.9
B
−0.1
C
+7.4
D
−0.9
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.42 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
David Yocum 3 sections · 3 terms · 2013–2015 3.23GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2013–2015
Compare with the course
Yocum vs. the course average
A
−19.3
B
+14.0
C
+7.7
D
−0.9
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.40 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.37
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.43
Instructor helpfulness4.43
Instructor availability3.93
Instructor communication4.43
Instructor effectiveness4.43
Instructor respectfulness4.53
Assignment measured knowledge3.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Mark Cottle 3 sections · 3 terms · 2013–2015 3.06GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2013–2015
Compare with the course
Cottle vs. the course average
A
−6.7
B
−9.1
C
+6.6
D
+2.5
F
+6.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.80 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.83
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.77
Instructor stimulates interest4.93
Mariam Mojdehi 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 3.38GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample
Lane Duncan 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.36GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.80 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Brian Bell 9 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.