Course record ARCH
ARCH 3855
Special Topics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
31 sections15 professors
Grades: 2017–2020Evaluations: 2017–2019
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score22/100
Below average
Daniel Baerlecken 2 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2019 3.81GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Baerlecken vs. the course average
A
+22.9
B
−16.3
C
−6.1
D
same
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.77 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.85
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Mark Cottle 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2020 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2020
Compare with the course
Cottle vs. the course average
A
+17.7
B
−11.1
C
−6.1
D
same
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.92 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Charles Rudolph 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2019 3.66GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Rudolph vs. the course average
A
+10.2
B
−6.4
C
−3.4
D
same
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.97 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.95
Course effectiveness4.95
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
George Johnston 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2020 3.48GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Johnston vs. the course average
A
−5.4
B
+7.4
C
−1.6
D
same
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.81 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.85
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.95
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.85
Athanassios Economou 2 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2020 3.47GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Economou vs. the course average
A
−12.1
B
+18.7
C
−6.1
D
same
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.00 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity3.50
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication3.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
John Peponis 2 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2019 3.41GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Peponis vs. the course average
A
−17.1
B
+23.7
C
−6.1
D
same
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.91 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.65
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Herman Howard 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2020 3.35GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2020
Compare with the course
Howard vs. the course average
A
−1.3
B
−14.1
C
+15.9
D
same
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.22 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.25
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.25
Instructor respectfulness4.25
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Sonit Bafna 2 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2018 3.34GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017–2018
Compare with the course
Bafna vs. the course average
A
−15.2
B
+12.5
C
+3.1
D
same
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.95 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Julie Kim 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2019 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2019
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
−22.3
B
+15.2
C
+7.5
D
same
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.56 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.25
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
William Leblanc 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2019 3.19GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Leblanc vs. the course average
A
−14.2
B
+5.3
C
+4.3
D
same
F
+4.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.58 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.47
Instructor clarity4.53
Course effectiveness4.53
Instructor enthusiasm4.77
Instructor helpfulness4.57
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.27
Assignment measured knowledge4.37
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.