Course record ARCH
ARCH 2017
Architecture Design Studio 3
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
23 sections16 professors
Grades: 2021–2025Evaluations: 2021–2024
Flunk Score32/100
Below average
Hayri Dortdivanlioglu 2 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2023 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2021–2023
Compare with the course
Dortdivanlioglu vs. the course average
A
+13.4
B
−5.5
C
−6.5
D
−0.7
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.85 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.53
Instructor clarity4.78
Course effectiveness4.72
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.87
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.54
Instructor stimulates interest4.68
Christina Shivers 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.77GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Shivers vs. the course average
A
+8.2
B
−0.4
C
−6.5
D
−0.7
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.84 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Daniel Baerlecken 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.59GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Baerlecken vs. the course average
A
+6.2
B
−6.7
C
−2.3
D
−0.7
F
+3.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.24 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.75
Instructor clarity2.75
Course effectiveness3.75
Instructor enthusiasm2.75
Instructor helpfulness3.25
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.00
Instructor effectiveness3.75
Instructor respectfulness3.25
Assignment measured knowledge3.13
Instructor stimulates interest3.13
Harris Dimitropoulos 3 sections · 3 terms · 2021–2023 3.39GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2021–2023
Compare with the course
Dimitropoulos vs. the course average
A
−16.1
B
+10.2
C
+7.2
D
−0.7
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.47 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.36
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.29
Instructor helpfulness4.63
Instructor availability4.47
Instructor communication4.53
Instructor effectiveness4.68
Instructor respectfulness4.62
Assignment measured knowledge4.03
Instructor stimulates interest4.17
Anna Kiningham 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.36GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Kiningham vs. the course average
A
−18.8
B
+12.1
C
+8.0
D
−0.7
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.81 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.86
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.94
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Clay Kiningham 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.20GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Kiningham vs. the course average
A
−25.8
B
+11.1
C
+16.0
D
−0.7
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.67 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.38
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.86
Assignment measured knowledge4.63
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Mark Cottle 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall3.98 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.50
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Julie Kim 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.79 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Marco Ancheita 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall4.95 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.78
Instructor clarity4.92
Course effectiveness4.88
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.92
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.92
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.78
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Frederick Pearsall 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.99 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.