Course record AE
AE 3310
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
33 sections12 professors
Grades: 2010–2016Evaluations: 2012–2016
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score9/100
Needs work
Narayanamoorthy Sankar 3 sections · 3 terms · 2013–2016 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2013–2016
Compare with the course
Sankar vs. the course average
A
+48.3
B
−29.8
C
−12.9
D
−3.5
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.89 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.77
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.78
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.87
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Daniel Schrage 6 sections · 6 terms · 2010–2016 3.50GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2010–2016
Compare with the course
Schrage vs. the course average
A
+8.6
B
+3.0
C
−9.1
D
−1.0
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2016
Overall4.16 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.43
Instructor clarity3.93
Course effectiveness4.33
Instructor enthusiasm4.53
Instructor helpfulness3.73
Instructor availability4.17
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness4.57
Assignment measured knowledge3.97
Instructor stimulates interest4.27
Joseph Saleh 4 sections · 4 terms · 2013–2016 3.45GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2013–2016
Compare with the course
Saleh vs. the course average
A
+12.9
B
−7.3
C
−4.1
D
−2.0
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2013Spring 2016
Overall4.90 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.95
Instructor clarity4.97
Course effectiveness4.92
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.92
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
John-Paul Clarke 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2016 3.02GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2016
Compare with the course
Clarke vs. the course average
A
−20.0
B
+18.0
C
+2.4
D
−1.9
F
+1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2016
Overall4.11 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.03
Instructor clarity4.17
Course effectiveness4.07
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness3.13
Instructor availability3.93
Instructor communication3.67
Instructor effectiveness4.03
Instructor respectfulness4.47
Assignment measured knowledge3.73
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Brian German 9 sections · 9 terms · 2010–2015 2.75GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2010–2015
Compare with the course
German vs. the course average
A
−18.0
B
−2.5
C
+11.8
D
+6.2
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2015
Overall4.54 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.42
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.58
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.08
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.57
Instructor effectiveness4.67
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.28
Instructor stimulates interest4.48
Michael Miller 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.38 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.35
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness3.95
Instructor availability4.45
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.25
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
Apinut Sirirojvisuth 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.38GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.86 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
J Prasad 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.30GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.28 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm3.60
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.60
Eric Johnson 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.18GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.05 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.10
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Elena Garcia 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.29 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication3.30
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.