Professor record PLAN
Jose Escobar
University of Colorado Boulder
100 grades1 section
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2022–2026
Flunk Score74/100
Strong
Grades + Evaluations
Grades99within-course grade standingEvaluations49school-relative student rating
Equal weight
PLAN 2004 · History and Theory of Sustainable Planning and Urban DesignPLAN 2004 · all instructors & syllabi
Student evaluations
4.59 / 5
School avg. 4.36
80 reported responses
How the ratings compare
Compared with the school, highest difference first.
Critical examination of evidence+0.50
Discussion+0.46
Inclusivity+0.43
Connection+0.40
Synthesis+0.40
Contribution+0.33
Creativity+0.30
Reflection+0.29
Interaction+0.24
Challenge+0.17
Technology+0.12
Feedback+0.05
Questions+0.02
Respect+0.02
Collaboration−0.01
Grading−0.14
Left: below school averageRight: above school average
0 = school average for each question. +0.50 means half a point above it on the 1–5 rating scale.
View exact values
CU-Boulder FCQ (16-dim, 1-5) · in PLAN 2004 · 49th percentile at the school · A signal, not a grade
| Question | Record | School | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical examination of evidence | 4.86 | 4.36 | +0.50 |
| Technology | 4.56 | 4.44 | +0.12 |
| Synthesis | 4.70 | 4.30 | +0.40 |
| Collaboration | 4.14 | 4.15 | −0.01 |
| Connection | 4.83 | 4.43 | +0.40 |
| Contribution | 4.59 | 4.26 | +0.33 |
| Discussion | 4.97 | 4.51 | +0.46 |
| Inclusivity | 4.60 | 4.17 | +0.43 |
| Grading | 4.16 | 4.30 | −0.14 |
| Reflection | 4.73 | 4.44 | +0.29 |
| Respect | 4.67 | 4.65 | +0.02 |
| Creativity | 4.61 | 4.31 | +0.30 |
| Feedback | 4.16 | 4.11 | +0.05 |
| Interaction | 4.79 | 4.55 | +0.24 |
| Challenge | 4.64 | 4.47 | +0.17 |
| Questions | 4.56 | 4.54 | +0.02 |
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.