Professor record
Bingxin Qi
Grade distribution unavailable
Evaluations: 2025–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataA reliable within-course grade or school-relative evaluation comparison is needed to score MATH 2300.
MATH 2300 · Statistical MethodsMATH 2300 · all instructors & syllabi
Student evaluations
3.67 / 5
School avg. 4.35
25 median item responses
How the ratings compare
Compared with the school, highest difference first.
Opportunities to be successful in course−0.05
Course was organized−0.45
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives−0.62
Course assignments facilitated learning−0.73
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills−0.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content−0.87
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content−0.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course−1.04
Left: below school averageRight: above school average
0 = school average for each question. +0.50 means half a point above it on the 1–5 rating scale.
View exact values
TTU HB2504 (8-item) · in MATH 2300 · A signal, not a grade
| Question | Record | School | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course was organized | 3.86 | 4.31 | −0.45 |
| Course assignments facilitated learning | 3.61 | 4.34 | −0.73 |
| Opportunities to be successful in course | 4.21 | 4.26 | −0.05 |
| Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills | 3.61 | 4.40 | −0.79 |
| Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content | 3.59 | 4.46 | −0.87 |
| Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content | 3.43 | 4.35 | −0.92 |
| Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course | 3.42 | 4.46 | −1.04 |
| Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives | 3.61 | 4.23 | −0.62 |
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.