Professor record
Christopher M Osborne
Grade distribution unavailable1 course
Evaluations: 2001–2002
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataThis record does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Student evaluations
3.70 / 5
School avg. 4.35
13 median item responses
How the ratings compare
Compared with the school, highest difference first.
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content−0.37
Course was organized−0.49
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content−0.61
Course assignments facilitated learning−0.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills−0.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course−0.68
Opportunities to be successful in course−0.74
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives−1.05
Left: below school averageRight: above school average
0 = school average for each question. +0.50 means half a point above it on the 1–5 rating scale.
View exact values
TTU HB2504 (8-item) · across 1 class · A signal, not a grade
| Question | Record | School | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course was organized | 3.83 | 4.31 | −0.49 |
| Course assignments facilitated learning | 3.72 | 4.34 | −0.63 |
| Opportunities to be successful in course | 3.52 | 4.26 | −0.74 |
| Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills | 3.77 | 4.40 | −0.63 |
| Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content | 3.85 | 4.46 | −0.61 |
| Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content | 3.98 | 4.35 | −0.37 |
| Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course | 3.79 | 4.46 | −0.68 |
| Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives | 3.17 | 4.23 | −1.05 |
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.