Professor record
Ajamu Loving
Grade distribution unavailable1 course
Evaluations: 2006–2007
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataThis record does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Student evaluations
4.44 / 5
School avg. 4.35
27 median item responses
How the ratings compare
Compared with the school, highest difference first.
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills+0.23
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course+0.20
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives+0.16
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content+0.14
Opportunities to be successful in course+0.08
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content+0.04
Course assignments facilitated learning−0.02
Course was organized−0.11
Left: below school averageRight: above school average
0 = school average for each question. +0.50 means half a point above it on the 1–5 rating scale.
View exact values
TTU HB2504 (8-item) · across 1 class · A signal, not a grade
| Question | Record | School | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course was organized | 4.21 | 4.31 | −0.11 |
| Course assignments facilitated learning | 4.32 | 4.34 | −0.02 |
| Opportunities to be successful in course | 4.34 | 4.26 | +0.08 |
| Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills | 4.64 | 4.40 | +0.23 |
| Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content | 4.60 | 4.46 | +0.14 |
| Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content | 4.39 | 4.35 | +0.04 |
| Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course | 4.67 | 4.46 | +0.20 |
| Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives | 4.39 | 4.23 | +0.16 |
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.