Professor record
Lan Liu-Gitz
Grade distribution unavailable1 course
Evaluations: 2006
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataThis record does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Student evaluations
2.56 / 5
School avg. 4.35
27 median item responses
How the ratings compare
Compared with the school, highest difference first.
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content−1.17
Course was organized−1.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course−1.49
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content−1.97
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills−1.97
Opportunities to be successful in course−2.04
Course assignments facilitated learning−2.14
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives−2.30
Left: below school averageRight: above school average
0 = school average for each question. +0.50 means half a point above it on the 1–5 rating scale.
View exact values
TTU HB2504 (8-item) · across 1 class · A signal, not a grade
| Question | Record | School | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course was organized | 3.06 | 4.31 | −1.25 |
| Course assignments facilitated learning | 2.20 | 4.34 | −2.14 |
| Opportunities to be successful in course | 2.23 | 4.26 | −2.04 |
| Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills | 2.43 | 4.40 | −1.97 |
| Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content | 3.29 | 4.46 | −1.17 |
| Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content | 2.38 | 4.35 | −1.97 |
| Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course | 2.97 | 4.46 | −1.49 |
| Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives | 1.93 | 4.23 | −2.30 |
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.