Professor record
Nathan S. Gill
Grade distribution unavailable
Evaluations: 2021–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataA reliable within-course grade or school-relative evaluation comparison is needed to score NRM 3323.
NRM 3323 · Prescribed BurningNRM 3323 · all instructors & syllabi
Student evaluations
4.53 / 5
School avg. 4.35
10 median item responses
How the ratings compare
Compared with the school, highest difference first.
Opportunities to be successful in course+0.37
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives+0.35
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills+0.22
Course assignments facilitated learning+0.21
Course was organized+0.17
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content+0.13
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content−0.01
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course−0.02
Left: below school averageRight: above school average
0 = school average for each question. +0.50 means half a point above it on the 1–5 rating scale.
View exact values
TTU HB2504 (8-item) · in NRM 3323 · A signal, not a grade
| Question | Record | School | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course was organized | 4.48 | 4.31 | +0.17 |
| Course assignments facilitated learning | 4.55 | 4.34 | +0.21 |
| Opportunities to be successful in course | 4.63 | 4.26 | +0.37 |
| Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills | 4.63 | 4.40 | +0.22 |
| Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content | 4.59 | 4.46 | +0.13 |
| Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content | 4.34 | 4.35 | −0.01 |
| Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course | 4.44 | 4.46 | −0.02 |
| Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives | 4.58 | 4.23 | +0.35 |
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.