Course record M H R

M H R 422

— ADVANCED ENTREPRENEURSHIP

University of Wisconsin-Madison

2,084 grades69 sections17 professors
Grades: 2006–2025
Flunk Score42/100
Mixed record

Professors 17 of 17

Zhiling Lin 27 grades · 1 term · 2024 3.96GPA
96.3% A
3.7% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

27 letter grades · 1 section · 2024

Compare with the course
Lin vs. the course average
A +27.9
B −25.6
C −1.9
D −0.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Philip Greenwood 309 grades · 9 terms · 2009–2020 3.88GPA
90.0% A
9.1% B
0.3% C
0.3% D
0.3% F

309 letter grades · 9 sections · 2009–2020

Compare with the course
Greenwood vs. the course average
A +21.6
B −20.2
C −1.6
D +0.1
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2009Fall 2020
Michael Williams 151 grades · 4 terms · 2022–2024 3.87GPA
90.7% A
7.9% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
1.3% F

151 letter grades · 5 sections · 2022–2024

Compare with the course
Williams vs. the course average
A +22.4
B −21.3
C −1.9
D −0.2
F +1.1

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2022Spring 2024
Jason O'Toole 29 grades · 1 term · 2009 3.86GPA
86.2% A
13.8% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

29 letter grades · 1 section · 2009

Compare with the course
O'Toole vs. the course average
A +17.8
B −15.5
C −1.9
D −0.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Elton Li 39 grades · 1 term · 2022 3.77GPA
79.5% A
20.5% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

39 letter grades · 1 section · 2022

Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A +11.1
B −8.8
C −1.9
D −0.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

John Surdyk 211 grades · 6 terms · 2011–2016 3.67GPA
69.7% A
28.4% B
1.4% C
0.5% D
0.0% F

211 letter grades · 6 sections · 2011–2016

Compare with the course
Surdyk vs. the course average
A +1.3
B −0.8
C −0.5
D +0.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Fall 2016
Chad Navis 311 grades · 6 terms · 2009–2015 3.65GPA
66.9% A
32.2% B
1.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

311 letter grades · 10 sections · 2009–2015

Compare with the course
Navis vs. the course average
A −1.5
B +2.9
C −1.0
D −0.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2009Spring 2015
Michael Philip Ciuchta 26 grades · 1 term · 2007 3.63GPA
76.9% A
19.2% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
3.8% F

26 letter grades · 1 section · 2007

Compare with the course
Ciuchta vs. the course average
A +8.5
B −10.0
C −1.9
D −0.2
F +3.7

Difference in percentage points.

Bekhzod Khoshimov 34 grades · 2 terms · 2020–2023 3.62GPA
61.8% A
38.2% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

34 letter grades · 2 sections · 2020–2023

Compare with the course
Khoshimov vs. the course average
A −6.6
B +9.0
C −1.9
D −0.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Phillip Kim 159 grades · 6 terms · 2006–2009 3.60GPA
64.2% A
34.0% B
1.9% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

159 letter grades · 7 sections · 2006–2009

Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A −4.2
B +4.7
C same
D −0.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2006Fall 2009
Jonathan Eckhardt 177 grades · 4 terms · 2008–2023 3.59GPA
62.1% A
35.6% B
2.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

177 letter grades · 5 sections · 2008–2023

Compare with the course
Eckhardt vs. the course average
A −6.2
B +6.3
C +0.3
D −0.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2008Fall 2023
Stefan Koehler 272 grades · 7 terms · 2011–2025 3.54GPA
59.9% A
36.8% B
2.6% C
0.7% D
0.0% F

272 letter grades · 8 sections · 2011–2025

Compare with the course
Koehler vs. the course average
A −8.5
B +7.5
C +0.7
D +0.5
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Fall 2025
Chang Liu 47 grades · 2 terms · 2023–2025 3.53GPA
55.3% A
42.6% B
2.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

47 letter grades · 2 sections · 2023–2025

Compare with the course
Liu vs. the course average
A −13.1
B +13.3
C +0.2
D −0.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Martin Ganco 106 grades · 2 terms · 2017–2019 3.45GPA
48.1% A
50.0% B
1.9% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

106 letter grades · 4 sections · 2017–2019

Compare with the course
Ganco vs. the course average
A −20.3
B +20.7
C same
D −0.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Adam Bock 149 grades · 5 terms · 2017–2020 3.21GPA
34.9% A
53.7% B
10.7% C
0.7% D
0.0% F

149 letter grades · 5 sections · 2017–2020

Compare with the course
Bock vs. the course average
A −33.5
B +24.4
C +8.8
D +0.4
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Fall 2020
Michele Eileen Yoder 18 grades · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 3.83GPA
83.3% A
16.7% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

18 letter grades · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample

Sangyun Kim 19 grades · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.63GPA
68.4% A
31.6% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

19 letter grades · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample

Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.