Course record WRTG
WRTG 3020
Topics in Writing
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable90 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score66/100
Strong
Anthony Abiragi 156 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
156 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.98
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.76
Reflection4.93
Respect4.99
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.96
Questions4.99
Sarah M Barkin 267 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
267 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.56
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.87
Reflection4.82
Respect4.97
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Andrew Edward Daigle 170 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
170 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.51
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.83
Reflection4.63
Respect4.86
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.72
Questions4.82
Levente Szentkiralyi 63 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.67
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.41
Reflection4.57
Respect4.75
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.68
Questions4.24
Seth G Myers 133 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
133 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.71
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.09
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.71
Reflection4.36
Respect4.99
Creativity4.72
Feedback3.46
Interaction4.73
Challenge3.81
Questions4.72
Lara Markward Hellie Jacobs 155 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
155 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.93
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.75
Reflection4.86
Respect4.90
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.90
Questions4.81
Michelle Albert 153 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
153 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.87
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.90
Reflection4.85
Respect4.93
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.74
Questions4.95
Peter James Kratzke 163 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
163 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology3.26
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration2.65
Connection3.22
Contribution4.22
Discussion3.98
Inclusivity3.64
Grading2.44
Reflection3.63
Respect3.32
Creativity3.83
Feedback2.55
Interaction3.28
Challenge3.76
Questions3.92
Andrew Wilson 222 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
222 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.98
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.91
Reflection4.96
Respect4.99
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.96
Questions4.94
Sally Edith Green 34 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.77
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.52
Reflection4.78
Respect4.94
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.83
Questions4.93
Tracy Lynn Ferrell 250 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
250 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.85
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.56
Reflection4.74
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.59
Questions4.72
Eric O Klinger 67 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.85
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.62
Reflection4.87
Respect4.79
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.87
Questions4.99
Alexander S Fobes 222 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
222 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.45
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.62
Reflection4.60
Respect4.76
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.70
Questions4.72
Sarah M Massey-Warren 110 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
110 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology3.83
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.50
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.55
Grading3.99
Reflection4.37
Respect4.41
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.39
Questions4.68
Damian Peter Doyle 150 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
150 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.81
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.54
Reflection4.59
Respect4.86
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.72
Questions4.83
Christopher Charles Barnes 53 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.86
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.93
Reflection4.90
Respect4.96
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.94
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.91
Questions4.99
Veronica Leigh House 9 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Eric B Burger 129 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
129 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.60
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.64
Reflection4.61
Respect4.82
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.68
Questions4.75
Kerry Anne Reilly 161 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
161 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.74
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.49
Reflection4.88
Respect4.94
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.86
Questions4.88
Gabriela Rios 70 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.28
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.92
Reflection4.06
Respect4.80
Creativity4.26
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.02
Questions4.00
Catherine Kunce 192 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
192 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology2.89
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.48
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.40
Grading2.80
Reflection4.54
Respect4.43
Creativity4.59
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.54
Questions4.16
Raul Melgoza 43 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.70
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.81
Reflection4.94
Respect4.99
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.87
Questions5.00
Paula Wenger 167 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
167 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.80
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.51
Reflection4.73
Respect4.86
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.64
Questions4.79
Sigman Mercer Byrd 280 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
280 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.81
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.52
Reflection4.81
Respect4.60
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.71
Questions4.78
Rebecca Joanne Dickson 26 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.59
Reflection4.70
Respect4.89
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.60
Questions4.98
Matthew S Henningsen 105 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
105 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.64
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.61
Reflection4.97
Respect4.95
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.96
Questions4.84
Andrea Feldman 98 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
98 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.64
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.90
Reflection4.83
Respect4.93
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.82
Questions4.93
Dawn Colley 306 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
306 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.61
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.47
Reflection4.70
Respect4.68
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.53
Daniel Gould Levine 78 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.92
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.98
Reflection4.91
Respect4.96
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.93
Questions4.87
Mariko Turk 9 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Christopher Raymond Ostro 27 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.50
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.59
Reflection4.78
Respect4.92
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.88
Questions4.85
Nancy Marie Stohlman 38 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.80
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.52
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.76
Questions4.76
Daniel Robert Long 94 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
94 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.53
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.87
Reflection4.39
Respect4.58
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.81
Questions4.90
Roberto Antonio Monico 34 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.98
Contribution4.88
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.79
Reflection4.81
Respect4.63
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.92
Questions4.82
Catherine Ro Ann Alber 43 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.75
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.69
Reflection4.84
Respect4.95
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.83
Questions4.88
Josette Lorig 26 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.63
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.40
Questions4.73
Tobin D Von Der Nuell 183 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
183 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.71
Connection3.78
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.11
Grading4.51
Reflection4.55
Respect4.62
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.60
Questions4.67
Christine Elizabeth Brooks 14 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Jennifer Hope Knowlton 137 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
137 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.44
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.57
Grading3.68
Reflection4.44
Respect4.80
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.54
Questions4.44
Diane Debella 6 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.30
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
John-Michael Rivera 5 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Laurie Ellen Gries 25 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.78
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.16
Grading3.84
Reflection4.17
Respect3.94
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.08
Challenge4.32
Questions3.97
Jay Ellis 95 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
95 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.48
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.46
Connection3.49
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.17
Grading3.53
Reflection3.19
Respect3.88
Creativity4.31
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.26
Questions4.16
Hunter C Thompson 40 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.90
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.64
Reflection4.84
Respect4.72
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.76
Questions4.84
Karen E. Ramirez 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Allison Gail Carr 5 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology3.88
Synthesis3.46
Collaboration3.58
Connection4.54
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.65
Grading3.88
Reflection4.00
Respect4.54
Creativity4.77
Feedback3.58
Interaction4.54
Challenge3.88
Questions4.35
Angela S Buchanan 3 reported responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.00
Reflection2.70
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions3.30
Christine Brooks Macdonald 71 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.43
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity3.99
Grading3.84
Reflection4.84
Respect4.78
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.86
Questions4.62
Denise Fernandes 50 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.85
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.49
Reflection4.71
Respect4.97
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.84
Questions4.91
Yukai Chen 7 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Kurtis William Hessel 201 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
201 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.56
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.69
Reflection4.71
Respect4.91
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.83
Questions4.89
Jason St James Lagapa 91 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
91 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.74
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.46
Reflection4.72
Respect4.81
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.69
Questions4.69
Christina Marie Eisert 5 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Alexis Deconing 7 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.70
Jarad Robert Krywicki 120 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
120 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.71
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.58
Reflection4.78
Respect4.88
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.84
Questions4.82
Michael Warren Cook 17 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
John Martin Ackerman 41 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.81
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.74
Grading3.85
Reflection4.60
Respect4.67
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.64
Questions4.56
Jamal A. Khlifat 54 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.40
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.11
Reflection4.68
Respect4.84
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.88
Questions4.93
Chris Ostro 10 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.99
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.97
Reflection5.00
Respect4.93
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.97
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Orly M Hersh 24 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.95
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.32
Reflection4.83
Respect4.99
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.87
Questions4.95
Michelle Gurule 59 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.84
Reflection4.79
Respect4.94
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.85
Questions4.81
Scott Fredrick Holman 29 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.51
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.30
Reflection4.09
Respect4.38
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.63
Challenge3.93
Questions4.68
Nicole Ann Mc Manus 31 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.86
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.48
Reflection4.51
Respect4.93
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.68
Questions4.85
Marisa Tirado 56 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.83
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.63
Reflection4.70
Respect4.91
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.72
Questions4.85
Elia Newsom 70 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.96
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.96
Reflection4.94
Respect4.94
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.86
Questions4.92
Lisa Suzanne Donovan 12 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.86
Contribution4.87
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.86
Reflection4.87
Respect4.99
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.99
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.87
Questions4.91
Steven Joseph Lamos 156 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
156 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.91
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.90
Reflection4.92
Respect4.95
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.94
Questions4.91
Riley Bartlett 71 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.26
Synthesis3.28
Collaboration3.32
Connection3.30
Contribution4.07
Discussion2.67
Inclusivity4.72
Grading2.29
Reflection3.85
Respect3.30
Creativity3.41
Feedback3.07
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.21
Questions2.78
Elizabeth Mary Stillwaggon Swan 5 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.23
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.62
Respect4.93
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.84
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.93
Questions5.00
David Alexander Chu 40 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.22
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.69
Reflection4.76
Respect4.84
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.82
Questions4.78
Stephanie Lynne Couey 54 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.99
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.98
Reflection4.98
Respect4.99
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
G Strauch 54 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.47
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.73
Reflection4.66
Respect4.78
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.78
Questions4.83
Adam Padgett 139 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
139 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.76
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.45
Reflection4.71
Respect4.85
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.66
Questions4.74
Nisha Shanmugaraj 45 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.92
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.80
Reflection4.92
Respect4.94
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.92
Questions4.91
Lonni Dee Pearce 61 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.98
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.80
Reflection4.95
Respect4.93
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.89
Questions4.88
Jennifer Grace Stewart 88 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
88 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.94
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.82
Reflection4.86
Respect4.96
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.91
Questions4.96
Andrew Luis Escanuela 65 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.88
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.37
Reflection4.61
Respect4.90
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.59
Questions4.72
Dan Leamen 19 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration3.92
Connection3.75
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.28
Reflection4.15
Respect4.52
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.25
Questions4.78
Jaquetta Shade-Johnson 15 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.78
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.64
Reflection4.83
Respect4.93
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.48
Questions4.91
Natalie Rose Earnhart 11 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.87
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.99
Grading2.76
Reflection4.27
Respect4.57
Creativity4.58
Feedback3.19
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.04
Questions3.61
Alice M.T. Meyung 33 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.88
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.91
Reflection4.88
Respect4.94
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.88
Questions4.97
Cooper Casale 22 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.77
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.83
Questions4.63
Franklin Mitchell 21 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.85
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.80
Reflection4.85
Respect4.95
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Nathan Dickman Pieplow 13 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Jason Shafer 4 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Sarah Farrell 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jaquelin Pelzer 11 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.73
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.69
Reflection4.75
Respect4.69
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.70
Questions4.69
Petger J Schaberg 21 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.55
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.25
Grading2.90
Reflection4.20
Respect3.80
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.55
Questions4.05
Ali Meyung 13 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Deann O'Donovan 4 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.