Course record WRTG
WRTG 1250
Advanced First-Year Writing and Rhetoric
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable16 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score51/100
Mixed record
Christine Elizabeth Brooks 18 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.25
Connection3.82
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.29
Grading4.45
Reflection4.72
Respect4.80
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.63
Questions4.78
Jay Ellis 62 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
62 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.84
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.19
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.24
Grading3.67
Reflection3.84
Respect4.43
Creativity4.39
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.07
Questions4.28
Jarad Robert Krywicki 26 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.75
Reflection4.45
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.75
Questions4.50
Eric B Burger 110 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
110 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.65
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.74
Reflection4.57
Respect4.79
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.75
Questions4.94
Elizabeth Mary Stillwaggon Swan 7 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Catherine Ro Ann Alber 7 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Marisa Tirado 8 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection3.50
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.90
Questions3.80
Josette Lorig 53 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.45
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.60
Reflection4.35
Respect4.77
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.53
Questions4.69
Christine Brooks Macdonald 27 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.40
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.70
Anthony Abiragi 26 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.03
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.41
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.36
Grading3.54
Reflection4.25
Respect4.59
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.15
Questions4.46
Tracy Lynn Ferrell 15 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.44
Technology4.09
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.91
Contribution3.37
Discussion4.14
Inclusivity3.37
Grading4.98
Reflection3.32
Respect4.95
Creativity3.37
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.14
Challenge3.32
Questions4.91
Kate Everson 13 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.90
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.80
Questions4.20
Kurtis William Hessel 22 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.68
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.55
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.82
Questions4.75
Catherine Kunce 4 reported responses 3.29Eval / 5
Overall3.29 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology2.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity2.50
Grading2.20
Reflection2.80
Respect3.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.20
Questions3.00
Natalie Rose Earnhart 4 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration3.35
Connection4.35
Contribution4.35
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.35
Reflection3.85
Respect4.85
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.50
Questions3.65
Young Kyung Min 21 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.15
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.15
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.70
Reflection4.35
Respect3.85
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.00
Questions3.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.