Course record WRTG
WRTG 1150
First-Year Writing and Rhetoric
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable105 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score54/100
Mixed record
Tobin D Von Der Nuell 293 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
293 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.18
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.53
Reflection4.71
Respect4.69
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.69
Questions4.64
Justin Atwell 63 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.71
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.84
Reflection4.74
Respect4.84
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.77
Questions4.86
Matthew S Henningsen 85 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
85 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration3.64
Connection4.80
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.25
Reflection4.36
Respect4.76
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.63
Questions4.46
Daniel Robert Long 87 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
87 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.64
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.58
Reflection4.51
Respect4.78
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.65
Questions4.79
Catherine Kunce 262 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
262 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology3.16
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.39
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity4.01
Grading3.65
Reflection4.15
Respect4.50
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.36
Questions4.00
Andrew Wilson 261 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
261 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.45
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.73
Reflection4.79
Respect4.78
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.74
Questions4.80
Lonni Dee Pearce 170 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
170 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.51
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.57
Reflection4.71
Respect4.80
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.61
Questions4.71
Eric B Burger 41 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.94
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.55
Reflection4.45
Respect4.95
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Denise Fernandes 57 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.41
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.36
Reflection4.19
Respect4.62
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.30
Questions4.64
Sarah M Barkin 70 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
70 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.84
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.96
Reflection4.96
Respect4.96
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.96
Questions4.97
Elizabeth Mary Stillwaggon Swan 302 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
302 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.41
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.27
Reflection4.27
Respect4.66
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.53
Questions4.43
Velda Khoo Yuan Ling 49 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.55
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.85
Reflection4.57
Respect4.91
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.95
Jenean Mcgee 25 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.70
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.69
Reflection4.80
Respect4.98
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.87
Questions4.94
Scott Fredrick Holman 81 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
81 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.36
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.14
Reflection4.14
Respect4.66
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.32
Interaction3.96
Challenge4.39
Questions4.39
Jarad Robert Krywicki 128 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
128 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.49
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.72
Reflection4.77
Respect4.69
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.82
Questions4.87
Catherine Ro Ann Alber 97 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
97 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.45
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.84
Reflection4.58
Respect4.86
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.62
Questions4.87
Roberto Antonio Monico 39 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.01
Connection4.73
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.32
Reflection4.48
Respect4.78
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.29
Questions4.52
Peter James Kratzke 9 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.40
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.00
Questions4.90
Tracy Lynn Ferrell 198 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
198 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.36
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.63
Reflection4.41
Respect4.66
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.56
Questions4.74
Jay Ellis 57 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.43
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.38
Grading3.91
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.50
Questions4.64
Andrew Edward Daigle 15 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Alexander Standen 54 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.56
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.67
Reflection4.37
Respect4.77
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.45
Questions4.70
Josette Lorig 43 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.30
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.35
Reflection4.28
Respect4.38
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.25
Questions4.31
Christopher Charles Barnes 17 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Yukai Chen 75 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.40
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.19
Reflection4.41
Respect4.75
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.51
Questions4.57
Nathan Dickman Pieplow 64 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
64 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.50
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.48
Reflection4.69
Respect4.63
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.61
Questions4.62
Alexis Deconing 77 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.52
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.84
Reflection4.61
Respect4.88
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.71
Questions4.79
Evan Rowe 26 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology3.87
Synthesis3.67
Collaboration3.48
Connection3.58
Contribution3.77
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.53
Grading3.16
Reflection3.40
Respect4.13
Creativity3.82
Feedback3.34
Interaction3.93
Challenge3.63
Questions3.83
Michael Warren Cook 102 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
102 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.32
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.39
Reflection4.52
Respect4.64
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.54
Questions4.62
Jennifer Hope Knowlton 140 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
140 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.14
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.57
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.68
Grading3.99
Reflection4.46
Respect4.85
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.71
Questions4.57
Paula Wenger 113 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
113 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.43
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.37
Reflection4.54
Respect4.67
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.61
Kurtis William Hessel 143 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
143 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.38
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.68
Reflection4.70
Respect4.89
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.69
Questions4.73
Hunter C Thompson 80 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
80 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.53
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.48
Reflection4.41
Respect4.44
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.41
Questions4.62
Jamal A. Khlifat 324 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
324 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.18
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.49
Reflection4.40
Respect4.79
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.60
Questions4.52
Andrea Feldman 32 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.36
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.50
Reflection4.37
Respect4.80
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.47
Questions4.73
Young Kyung Min 108 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
108 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology3.09
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.58
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.12
Grading3.68
Reflection4.58
Respect4.23
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.61
Challenge3.92
Questions4.15
Seth G Myers 219 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
219 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.50
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.48
Reflection4.48
Respect4.86
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.81
Questions4.72
Sarah Nolan 92 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.19
Connection4.51
Contribution4.14
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.88
Reflection4.38
Respect4.83
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.61
Questions4.82
Rebecca Joanne Dickson 41 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.60
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.79
Respect4.70
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.79
Questions4.80
Michael Patrick Zizzi 39 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.43
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.37
Respect4.43
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.60
Questions4.47
Christopher Raymond Ostro 47 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.50
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.80
Reflection4.54
Respect4.88
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.58
Questions4.91
Veronica Leigh House 9 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
John Martin Ackerman 36 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration3.48
Connection4.50
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity4.51
Grading3.72
Reflection4.25
Respect4.56
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.40
Questions4.54
Christina Marie Eisert 53 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.43
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.73
Reflection4.26
Respect4.80
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.54
Questions4.84
Levente Szentkiralyi 46 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.73
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.17
Reflection4.43
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.60
Questions4.47
Mitchell Ingraham 21 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.45
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.15
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.40
Reflection3.90
Respect4.75
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.75
Challenge3.90
Questions4.55
Lara Markward Hellie Jacobs 50 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.24
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.24
Reflection4.38
Respect4.83
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.41
Questions4.61
Kathleen Marie Mcguire 60 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.12
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect4.94
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.70
Questions4.87
Min-Chun Hsiao 53 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.59
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.49
Reflection4.57
Respect4.77
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.52
Questions4.78
Nicole Ann Mc Manus 182 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
182 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.40
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.72
Reflection4.54
Respect4.73
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.52
Questions4.94
Sally Edith Green 30 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.65
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.45
Reflection4.60
Respect4.65
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.55
Questions4.60
Jared W. Desjardins 16 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Sarah M Massey-Warren 8 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Marlene E Miyamoto 358 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
358 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.16
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.26
Reflection4.19
Respect4.57
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.24
Questions4.32
Sigman Mercer Byrd 91 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
91 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.09
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.03
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.49
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.09
Reflection4.19
Respect4.27
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.00
Questions4.16
Natalie Elisabeth Brown 44 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.53
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.53
Reflection4.53
Respect4.75
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.83
Jason St James Lagapa 156 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
156 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.47
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.86
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Petger J Schaberg 30 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.73
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.78
Contribution3.98
Discussion3.77
Inclusivity3.96
Grading3.07
Reflection3.67
Respect3.88
Creativity4.19
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.86
Questions4.00
Lisa Suzanne Donovan 15 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.67
Respect4.87
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.73
Questions4.87
Riley Bartlett 291 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
291 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.52
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.39
Reflection4.39
Respect4.67
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.41
Questions4.54
Laurie Ellen Gries 16 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Damian Peter Doyle 27 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.62
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.26
Reflection4.42
Respect4.85
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.34
Questions4.88
Anthony Abiragi 22 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.54
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.15
Reflection4.15
Respect4.69
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.35
Questions4.80
Elia Newsom 77 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.74
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.92
Reflection4.81
Respect4.91
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.92
Questions4.94
David Alexander Chu 169 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
169 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.92
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.63
Reflection4.36
Respect4.62
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.51
Questions4.56
Stephanie Lynne Couey 113 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
113 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.65
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.70
Reflection4.74
Respect4.86
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.78
Questions4.82
Victoria Marie Stout 30 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.77
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.78
Reflection4.71
Respect4.93
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.93
Questions4.67
Rebecca Kogan Lee 105 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
105 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.31
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.69
Reflection4.52
Respect4.82
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.60
Questions4.88
Michelle Gurule 34 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.62
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.90
Reflection4.67
Respect4.92
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.51
Questions4.83
Jennifer Grace Stewart 178 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
178 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.58
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.64
Reflection4.66
Respect4.74
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.82
Questions4.80
Collin Eagen 76 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
76 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.58
Connection3.93
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.81
Reflection4.15
Respect4.41
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.08
Marisa Tirado 84 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
84 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.49
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.49
Reflection4.48
Respect4.73
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.43
Questions4.70
Emily Beam 24 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.25
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.36
Reflection4.22
Respect4.45
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.22
Questions4.23
Kerry Anne Reilly 139 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
139 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.54
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.28
Reflection4.71
Respect4.87
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.76
Questions4.87
Chris Ostro 93 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
93 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.51
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.62
Reflection4.77
Respect4.77
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.78
Questions4.88
Gloria M Adamson 29 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.77
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.27
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.43
Reflection4.63
Respect4.73
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.27
Questions4.40
Velda Khoo 40 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology4.41
Synthesis3.71
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.03
Contribution4.01
Discussion3.96
Inclusivity3.53
Grading4.51
Reflection3.76
Respect4.61
Creativity3.81
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.18
Challenge3.62
Questions4.34
Dan Leamen 169 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
169 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.85
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.54
Reflection4.62
Respect4.84
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.76
Questions4.76
Pilar Munoz 13 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.99
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.99
Reflection4.99
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.81
G Strauch 39 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.89
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.59
Reflection4.78
Respect4.99
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.88
Questions4.51
Adam Padgett 39 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.47
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.73
Reflection4.57
Respect4.87
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.57
Questions4.83
Brooks Mitchell 7 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Cooper Casale 97 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
97 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.75
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.45
Reflection4.74
Respect4.69
Creativity4.69
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.82
Questions4.64
Franklin Mitchell 61 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.78
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.91
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.86
Questions4.97
Brooke Elizabeth Latham 21 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.75
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Scott Benjamin Ritner 83 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
83 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.55
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.58
Reflection4.57
Respect4.79
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.65
Questions4.83
Jessica Farah Bornstein 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Alexander S Fobes 53 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.20
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.06
Reflection4.52
Respect4.52
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.38
Questions4.67
Stacey Leigh Milliken 127 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
127 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.76
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.77
Reflection4.78
Respect4.75
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.82
Questions4.94
Natalie Rose Earnhart 17 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.72
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.22
Reflection4.55
Respect4.81
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.39
Questions4.67
Jason Brandt Schaefer 31 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.39
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.48
Reflection4.72
Respect4.87
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Andrew Luis Escanuela 179 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
179 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.40
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.62
Questions4.80
Kate Everson 99 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
99 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.84
Technology3.56
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration4.23
Connection3.91
Contribution3.84
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity3.74
Grading3.58
Reflection4.05
Respect4.10
Creativity4.01
Feedback3.31
Interaction4.22
Challenge3.99
Questions3.39
Amy Glen Bobeda 6 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.75
Jason Shafer 26 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.42
Connection3.72
Contribution3.35
Discussion3.83
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.01
Reflection3.94
Respect4.41
Creativity4.04
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.15
Questions4.01
Alice M.T. Meyung 62 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
62 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.75
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.80
Reflection4.85
Respect4.95
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.85
Questions4.97
John Joseph Daly 7 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Tamara L Milbourn 29 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.15
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.55
Reflection4.60
Respect4.65
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.45
Questions4.75
Gabriela Rios 9 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.90
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Nicholas Dertinger 75 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration3.37
Connection4.47
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.51
Reflection4.54
Respect4.69
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.75
Interaction3.93
Challenge4.69
Questions4.66
Jaquelin Pelzer 10 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology3.69
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.18
Connection3.96
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.22
Reflection3.89
Respect4.25
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.34
Challenge3.89
Questions4.20
James Roland Carson 2 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Kaley Nicole King 31 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.58
Reflection4.56
Respect4.89
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.76
Questions4.84
Sarah Farrell 28 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration3.34
Connection4.41
Contribution4.41
Discussion3.74
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.41
Reflection4.59
Respect4.68
Creativity4.34
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.57
Questions4.10
Ali Meyung 16 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.