Course record WGST
WGST 2290
Philosophy and Gender
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable26 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score48/100
Mixed recordAjene Nicar Robinson-Burris 2 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Gail E. Linsenbard 26 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration3.79
Connection5.00
Contribution4.04
Discussion4.04
Inclusivity4.78
Grading3.81
Reflection4.16
Respect4.52
Creativity4.69
Feedback3.44
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.30
Questions3.46
Jennifer Joyce Gallagher 6 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.55
Connection5.00
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.32
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.13
Feedback4.69
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Matthew Shields 6 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.65
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Megan Louise Kitts 4 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.83
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.83
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.67
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.33
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.83
Alexandra Lloyd 17 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.93
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.90
Questions4.87
Austin James Silberberg 9 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.65
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.45
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.75
Kira Dorst 6 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology3.03
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.25
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.49
Reflection4.49
Respect4.99
Creativity2.99
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.49
Questions4.49
Dawn Marie Jacob 9 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.99
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.97
Connection5.00
Contribution4.97
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.98
Reflection4.02
Respect4.99
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.99
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Evan Jaymes Frook 9 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.93
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.84
Reflection4.18
Respect4.61
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.89
Questions4.96
Sandra Skene 48 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.66
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.12
Reflection4.40
Respect4.51
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.23
Questions4.40
Eric C Brown 3 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.70
Reflection3.70
Respect4.30
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions3.70
Amanda Michelle Loeffelholz 12 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.23
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.26
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.74
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.87
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.82
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Thomas Anthony Bonn 7 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.95
Connection5.00
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.89
Reflection4.13
Respect4.98
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.95
Questions4.98
Rebecca Bailey 5 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions3.40
Henry Campbell 4 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.00
Kristin Marie Mickelson 4 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions3.00
Wayne Nicholas Hardaker 1 reported responses 2.55Eval / 5
Overall2.55 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.00
Technology1.00
Synthesis1.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection5.00
Contribution2.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading1.00
Reflection1.00
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction2.00
Challenge3.00
Questions3.00
Rowen Foliver 3 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.50
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.25
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.75
Erica A Nieblas 2 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions3.00
Robert Anthony Williams 1 reported responses 2.40Eval / 5
Overall2.40 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology1.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion1.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading1.00
Reflection5.00
Respect1.00
Creativity1.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge1.00
Questions1.00
Sparrow Locurto 3 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.25
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Sionna Lynch 3 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.43
Connection5.00
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.57
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.43
Questions4.17
Shane Bodhi Melnitzer 8 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.45
Connection5.00
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.93
Grading3.99
Reflection4.46
Respect4.78
Creativity4.31
Feedback4.31
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.93
Questions4.84
Hye-Ryoung Kang 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Gift Nwaozor 2 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection5.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.