Course record WGST
WGST 1270
Introduction to American Literature by Women
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable22 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Alyssa Renee Miller 7 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.40
Questions4.75
Mary K Klages 12 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.38
Reflection4.58
Respect4.82
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.72
Questions4.82
Melodie A Roschman 5 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.60
Mairead Corrine Case 2 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jessica Lynn Lawson 3 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Cheryl A Higashida 20 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology3.93
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.41
Contribution3.71
Discussion3.98
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.03
Reflection4.16
Respect4.62
Creativity4.34
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.07
Questions3.96
John R Pugh 11 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.96
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.61
Reflection4.83
Respect4.93
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.50
Questions4.96
Leah M White 4 reported responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology2.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.50
Connection3.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.30
Reflection3.50
Respect3.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.30
Challenge4.00
Questions3.50
Devon Lamonte Keyes 8 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Jack Pugh 2 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions3.50
Sarah Dawn Ramsey 10 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.55
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.75
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.75
Lukas Jedediah Devries 12 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.91
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.64
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.85
Questions4.91
Brittany Whelan 6 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Lilly Rothman 5 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Brooks Mitchell 3 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.30
Jaquelin Pelzer 5 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Bk Clapham 5 reported responses 3.22Eval / 5
Overall3.22 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading2.80
Reflection4.00
Respect3.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction3.60
Challenge3.50
Questions3.20
Kaige Sellers 16 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.15
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.55
Grading3.70
Reflection4.55
Respect4.35
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.15
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.20
Questions3.65
Jenny Cookson 2 reported responses 3.52Eval / 5
Overall3.52 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection2.50
Respect4.50
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.00
Questions5.00
Tucker Conine 7 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.40
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.10
Respect4.10
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.00
Questions3.90
Charlotte Dickinson 7 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.40
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Rachel Franklin Wood 1 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.