Course record THTR
THTR 1009
Theatre and Society
University of Colorado Boulder
826 grades25 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Ivan Daniel Espinosa 29 grades · 1 term 3.98GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Espinosa vs. the course average
A
+29.7
B
−18.3
C
−6.3
D
−1.8
F
−3.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 1 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.42 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Theodore Stark 84 grades · 1 term 3.79GPA
84 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stark vs. the course average
A
+26.0
B
−19.4
C
−6.3
D
+0.6
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 4 of 88 enrolled.
Overall3.99 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology3.76
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.32
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.61
Grading3.61
Reflection3.67
Respect4.59
Creativity4.13
Feedback3.14
Interaction4.06
Challenge4.14
Questions4.30
Samantha Noelle Collier 84 grades · 1 term 3.65GPA
84 letter grades
Compare with the course
Collier vs. the course average
A
+5.8
B
+0.8
C
−3.9
D
−0.6
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 3 of 87 enrolled.
Oliver W Gerland 27 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gerland vs. the course average
A
+7.2
B
−3.3
C
−6.3
D
−1.8
F
+4.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 1 of 28 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Kaitlin Rose Moore Nabors 98 grades · 1 term 3.44GPA
98 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nabors vs. the course average
A
−1.5
B
+0.7
C
+0.8
D
+0.2
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 2 of 100 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.66
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.49
Reflection4.67
Respect4.88
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.77
Questions4.79
Heather Marie Kelley 186 grades · 1 term 3.43GPA
186 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kelley vs. the course average
A
−1.8
B
+1.9
C
+1.2
D
−1.3
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
4.6% withdrew · 9 of 195 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.80
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.72
Reflection4.66
Respect4.79
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.51
Questions4.76
Ashlyn King Barnett 67 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Barnett vs. the course average
A
−1.2
B
+0.6
C
−0.3
D
−1.8
F
+2.7
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 4 of 71 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Benjamin Stasny 84 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
84 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stasny vs. the course average
A
−10.9
B
+10.4
C
−0.3
D
+0.6
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 1 of 85 enrolled.
Sarah Alaaeldin Fahmy 31 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fahmy vs. the course average
A
−2.3
B
−8.9
C
+3.4
D
+4.6
F
+3.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 31 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.90
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.71
Reflection4.78
Respect4.83
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.83
Questions4.77
Justin Andrew Johnson 38 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Johnson vs. the course average
A
−16.8
B
+9.8
C
+9.5
D
−1.8
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.0% withdrew · 2 of 40 enrolled.
Overall3.83 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.50
Contribution2.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Amanda Rose Hartley Villarreal 61 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
61 letter grades
Compare with the course
Villarreal vs. the course average
A
−20.9
B
+9.4
C
+6.8
D
+4.7
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
4.7% withdrew · 3 of 64 enrolled.
Isabel May Smith-Bernstein 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.67GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 13 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Erin Rachel Kaplan 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.43GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 11 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Kevin C Crowe 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.93GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
7.1% withdrew · 1 of 14 enrolled.
Overall3.27 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology2.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.00
Creativity3.30
Feedback2.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.00
Questions3.00
Brittny Ann Daboll 19 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Sebastian Kearney 26 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Graham Bryant 20 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Sam Collier 34 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Kasra Mirfattahi 51 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.57
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.37
Reflection4.29
Respect4.77
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.51
Questions4.67
Ben Stasny 18 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Iv<E1>N-Daniel Espinosa 113 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
113 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.47
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.41
Reflection4.50
Respect4.65
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.53
Questions4.56
Allison Wilson 38 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.30
Questions4.20
Julia Anderson 18 reported responses 3.21Eval / 5
Overall3.21 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology2.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity4.60
Grading2.90
Reflection3.50
Respect3.70
Creativity2.90
Feedback2.40
Interaction3.90
Challenge2.80
Questions3.30
Vianney Aguilar 49 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.19
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.27
Reflection4.39
Respect4.72
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.39
Questions4.45
Alena Lakha 9 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.