Course record SPAN
SPAN 3000
Advanced Spanish Language Skills
University of Colorado Boulder
1,133 grades34 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score60/100
Strong
Brittany Frodge 36 grades · 1 term 3.84GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Frodge vs. the course average
A
+27.6
B
−20.8
C
−3.7
D
−1.2
F
−1.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.86 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.85
Reflection4.85
Respect4.80
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Rocio Gavira Dominguez 37 grades · 1 term 3.68GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dominguez vs. the course average
A
+22.5
B
−18.3
C
−3.7
D
−1.2
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 1 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.90 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.97
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.96
Reflection4.93
Respect4.99
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.78
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.96
Questions4.99
Blake A Delong 120 grades · 1 term 3.62GPA
120 letter grades
Compare with the course
Delong vs. the course average
A
+14.6
B
−7.5
C
−4.8
D
−1.2
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 3 of 123 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
96 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.47
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.66
Reflection4.49
Respect4.85
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.57
Questions4.82
Robert Charles Pritchard 50 grades · 1 term 3.58GPA
50 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pritchard vs. the course average
A
+6.7
B
−1.1
C
−2.4
D
−1.2
F
−1.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 1 of 51 enrolled.
Monserrat Asecio 59 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
59 letter grades
Compare with the course
Asecio vs. the course average
A
+8.2
B
−7.1
C
−1.4
D
+0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 1 of 60 enrolled.
Overall4.32 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.78
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.78
Grading3.82
Reflection3.84
Respect4.72
Creativity3.84
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.07
Questions4.17
Maria Vazquez 57 grades · 1 term 3.47GPA
57 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vazquez vs. the course average
A
+12.4
B
−13.3
C
+0.6
D
−1.2
F
+1.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 57 enrolled.
Overall4.89 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.61
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.86
Reflection4.83
Respect4.86
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.64
Questions4.86
Jonatan Cantu Guerra 129 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
129 letter grades
Compare with the course
Guerra vs. the course average
A
+3.9
B
−2.0
C
−1.8
D
−1.2
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.3% withdrew · 3 of 132 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
123 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.87
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.72
Reflection4.84
Respect4.96
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.79
Questions4.89
Juan Manuel Garcia Fernandez 100 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
100 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fernandez vs. the course average
A
−2.3
B
+2.9
C
+0.6
D
−0.2
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 1 of 101 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.47
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.79
Reflection4.69
Respect4.74
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.55
Questions4.88
Jonnia Carolan 34 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Carolan vs. the course average
A
+3.5
B
−5.6
C
−3.5
D
−1.2
F
+6.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 1 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.86 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.91
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.91
Reflection4.95
Respect4.98
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.98
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.91
Questions5.00
Maxwell T Moloney 77 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
77 letter grades
Compare with the course
Moloney vs. the course average
A
−5.4
B
−1.9
C
+6.5
D
+0.1
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 77 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
64 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.75
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.38
Reflection4.68
Respect4.90
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.63
Questions4.83
Carrie Chorba Fross 163 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
163 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fross vs. the course average
A
−10.3
B
+6.5
C
+0.3
D
+3.1
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 3 of 166 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
83 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.86
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.87
Reflection4.83
Respect4.95
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.88
Questions4.97
Sandra Ortiz Valencia 111 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
111 letter grades
Compare with the course
Valencia vs. the course average
A
−19.8
B
+17.7
C
+2.6
D
+0.6
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 4 of 115 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.84
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.62
Reflection4.50
Respect4.88
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.82
Questions4.88
Blanca Berjano Rodriguez 53 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
53 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rodriguez vs. the course average
A
−25.4
B
+18.0
C
+10.5
D
−1.2
F
−1.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 1 of 54 enrolled.
Alexander M Cardenas 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.
Juan Antonio Garcia Oyervides 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.74GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.
Geoffrey Miller 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.47GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.62 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Jennifer Ann Delaney 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.39GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.
Kelly Dawn Noe 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.14GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Jose Luis N/A Toledano Llorente 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.96GPA
14 letter grades · Limited sample
12.5% withdrew · 2 of 16 enrolled.
Robert Charles Pritchard Iv 27 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.58
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.52
Reflection4.71
Respect4.48
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.61
Questions4.83
Blanca Berjano 44 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.47
Reflection4.45
Respect4.80
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.56
Questions4.73
Jose Luis Toledano 5 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sandra Caldere Mejias 9 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.00
Respect4.30
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.10
Questions4.40
Viktoria Katherl 12 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Edgar Vargas Blanco 44 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.56
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.36
Reflection4.58
Respect4.81
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.71
Questions4.60
Mary K Long 25 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.80
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.82
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.67
Questions4.85
Ana Isabel Rocha Santos 30 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.75
Respect4.95
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Carlota Soto Abraham 8 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Maria Del Carmen Vidal Garcia 19 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Griffin Carty 22 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.82
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.57
Reflection4.77
Respect5.00
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.55
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.78
Questions4.85
Miguel <C1>Ngel Bartolome 9 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.42
Contribution4.92
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.69
Grading3.96
Reflection4.35
Respect4.81
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.92
Questions4.69
Zazil Collins 5 reported responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology2.80
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.60
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading2.40
Reflection3.40
Respect3.80
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.80
Questions4.00
Elle Swenson 31 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect4.95
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Karla Rosete Nunez 10 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.