Course record SPAN
SPAN 2120
Second-Year Spanish 2
University of Colorado Boulder
904 grades19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score42/100
Mixed record
Susan Rita Hallstead 123 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
123 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hallstead vs. the course average
A
+15.9
B
−16.2
C
+0.6
D
+0.1
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 1 of 124 enrolled.
Overall4.79 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.69
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.52
Reflection4.68
Respect4.87
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Antonia M Green 94 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
94 letter grades
Compare with the course
Green vs. the course average
A
+18.1
B
−15.1
C
−5.4
D
+1.5
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 94 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.21
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.21
Reflection4.33
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.44
Questions4.90
Karen L Malcolm 53 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
53 letter grades
Compare with the course
Malcolm vs. the course average
A
+4.7
B
−2.9
C
−1.9
D
−0.7
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 53 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.07
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.27
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.26
Reflection4.54
Respect4.59
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.61
Questions4.41
Yohainna Abdala Mesa 46 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
46 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mesa vs. the course average
A
−2.2
B
+5.1
C
−1.0
D
−0.7
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 2 of 48 enrolled.
Overall4.49 / 5
80 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.48
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.62
Grading3.71
Reflection4.44
Respect4.92
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.63
Questions4.55
Margaret Herland 52 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
52 letter grades
Compare with the course
Herland vs. the course average
A
−3.8
B
+7.5
C
−1.8
D
−0.7
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
5.5% withdrew · 3 of 55 enrolled.
Overall4.70 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.78
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.66
Reflection4.84
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.45
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Maria Christina Piras 385 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
385 letter grades
Compare with the course
Piras vs. the course average
A
−9.5
B
+10.1
C
+0.3
D
−0.1
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 17 of 402 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
197 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.10
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.90
Reflection4.22
Respect4.39
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.60
Questions4.34
Kelly Dawn Noe 34 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Noe vs. the course average
A
+14.7
B
−25.9
C
+4.2
D
−0.7
F
+7.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 1 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.35
Respect4.45
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Maria E Moreno 40 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
40 letter grades
Compare with the course
Moreno vs. the course average
A
−25.0
B
+14.4
C
+7.5
D
+1.8
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
9.1% withdrew · 4 of 44 enrolled.
Overall4.01 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology2.68
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.51
Connection3.95
Contribution4.04
Discussion3.99
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.74
Reflection4.03
Respect4.11
Creativity4.06
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.19
Questions4.06
David B Faulkner 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.72GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
5.3% withdrew · 1 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Charles Toye 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.64GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
15.4% withdrew · 2 of 13 enrolled.
Overall4.89 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Anne Helen Becher 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.30GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.
Overall4.86 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Vivian Elmore 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.22GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
5.9% withdrew · 1 of 17 enrolled.
Overall4.70 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.55
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.55
Respect4.85
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.80
Carrie Chorba Fross 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.12GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.
Maria Cristina Piras 214 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
214 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.21
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.13
Reflection4.59
Respect4.64
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.74
Questions4.68
Karen Gaston Malcolm 50 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.79
Technology4.09
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.89
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.02
Reflection4.11
Respect4.73
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Edgar Vargas Blanco 47 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.68
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.30
Reflection4.72
Respect4.81
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.84
Questions4.87
Allison Lee Glover 9 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mary K Long 13 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.79
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.93
Reflection4.29
Respect4.88
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.82
Questions4.98
Kaylyn Blair 13 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.